CW implies normal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{topospace property implication}} | {{topospace property implication| | ||
stronger = CW-space| | |||
weaker = normal space}} | |||
{{cellular induction proof}} | {{cellular induction proof}} | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Every [[CW-space]] (viz every space which can be given a [[CW-complex]] structure) is [[normal space|normal]], viz it is [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]] and any two disjoint closed sets can be separated by disjoint open sets. | Every [[CW-space]] (viz every space which can be given a [[CW-complex]] structure) is [[normal space|normal]], viz it is [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]] and any two disjoint closed sets can be separated by disjoint open sets. (note that Hausdorffness follows from one of the definitions, so we only prove normality). | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
Since <math>D^n</math> is normal, the function <math>g:P \to I</math> extends to a [[continuous map]] <math>g':D^n \to I</math>. The restriction of <math>g'</math> to the interior of <math>D^n</math>, is the extension we require. | Since <math>D^n</math> is normal, the function <math>g:P \to I</math> extends to a [[continuous map]] <math>g':D^n \to I</math>. The restriction of <math>g'</math> to the interior of <math>D^n</math>, is the extension we require. | ||
==Related results== | |||
* [[CW implies perfectly normal]] | |||
* [[CW implies paracompact]]: This is a stronger result because any [[paracompact Hausdorff space]] is normal | |||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 8 August 2008
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., CW-space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about CW-space|Get more facts about normal space
This article involves a proof using cellular induction, viz, it inductive construction on the -skeleton of a cellular space
Statement
Every CW-space (viz every space which can be given a CW-complex structure) is normal, viz it is Hausdorff and any two disjoint closed sets can be separated by disjoint open sets. (note that Hausdorffness follows from one of the definitions, so we only prove normality).
Proof
Goal of the proof
Let be a CW-space. Equip with a CW-complex structure and let denote the -skeleton with respect to that structure.
Let be closed subsets. The goal is to construct a function such that and (this will show that and are separated by disjoint open sets).
To construct this , we construct a family of functions on the -skeletons, such that restricted to is for , and such that and .
Proof details
Suppose we have constructed which takes the value on and on . We need to use this to define on , which extends .
Now we extend the function separately on the interior of each disc. Note that the choice of how we extend the function on the interior of one disc, does not affect the choice on the interior of any other disc.
For a disc corresponding to a cell attached via a map , we have the following data:
- A map
- A subset of , which is , along with all points on whose image via lies inside
- A corresponding subset of
Consider as a subset of . This is a closed subset. Define such that , and . The well-definedness and continuity of follow from the properties of , the fact that all three subsets are closed, and the gluing lemma.
Since is normal, the function extends to a continuous map . The restriction of to the interior of , is the extension we require.
Related results
- CW implies perfectly normal
- CW implies paracompact: This is a stronger result because any paracompact Hausdorff space is normal