CW implies normal: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{topospace property implication}}
{{topospace property implication|
stronger = CW-space|
weaker = normal space}}


{{cellular induction proof}}
{{cellular induction proof}}
Line 32: Line 34:


Since <math>D^n</math> is normal, the function <math>g:P \to I</math> extends to a [[continuous map]] <math>g':D^n \to I</math>. The restriction of <math>g'</math> to the interior of <math>D^n</math>, is the extension we require.
Since <math>D^n</math> is normal, the function <math>g:P \to I</math> extends to a [[continuous map]] <math>g':D^n \to I</math>. The restriction of <math>g'</math> to the interior of <math>D^n</math>, is the extension we require.
==Related results==
* [[CW implies perfectly normal]]
* [[CW implies paracompact]]: This is a stronger result because any [[paracompact Hausdorff space]] is normal

Latest revision as of 11:14, 8 August 2008

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., CW-space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about CW-space|Get more facts about normal space

This article involves a proof using cellular induction, viz, it inductive construction on the n-skeleton of a cellular space

Statement

Every CW-space (viz every space which can be given a CW-complex structure) is normal, viz it is Hausdorff and any two disjoint closed sets can be separated by disjoint open sets. (note that Hausdorffness follows from one of the definitions, so we only prove normality).

Proof

Goal of the proof

Let X be a CW-space. Equip X with a CW-complex structure and let Xn denote the n-skeleton with respect to that structure.

Let A,BX be closed subsets. The goal is to construct a function f:X[0,1] such that f(A)=0 and f(B)=1 (this will show that A and B are separated by disjoint open sets).

To construct this f, we construct a family of functions fn on the n-skeletons, such that fn restricted to Xm is fm for mn, and such that fn(AXn)=0 and fn(BXn)=1.

Proof details

Suppose we have constructed fn1:Xn1I which takes the value 0 on AXn1 and 1 on BXn1. We need to use this to define fn on Xn, which extends fn1.

Now we extend the function separately on the interior of each disc. Note that the choice of how we extend the function on the interior of one disc, does not affect the choice on the interior of any other disc.

For a disc corresponding to a cell ei attached via a map Φi, we have the following data:

  • A map fn1Φi:Sn1I
  • A subset A of Dn, which is Aei, along with all points on Sn1 whose image via Φi lies inside A
  • A corresponding subset B of Dn

Consider Sn1AB=P as a subset of Dn. This is a closed subset. Define g:PI such that g(A)=0, g(B)=1 and g|Sn1=fn1Φi. The well-definedness and continuity of g follow from the properties of fn1, the fact that all three subsets are closed, and the gluing lemma.

Since Dn is normal, the function g:PI extends to a continuous map g:DnI. The restriction of g to the interior of Dn, is the extension we require.

Related results