Tietze extension theorem: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
Line 8: Line 8:


# [[uses::Urysohn's lemma]]: This states that for, given two closed subsets <math>A,B</math> of a [[normal space]] <math>X</math>, there is a continuous function <math>h:X \to [0,1]</math> such that <math>h(A) = 0</math> and <math>h(B) = 1</math>.
# [[uses::Urysohn's lemma]]: This states that for, given two closed subsets <math>A,B</math> of a [[normal space]] <math>X</math>, there is a continuous function <math>h:X \to [0,1]</math> such that <math>h(A) = 0</math> and <math>h(B) = 1</math>.
# [[uses::Closedness is transitive]]: A [[closed subset]] (in the [[subspace topology]]) of a [[closed subset]] is closed in the whole space.


==Proof==
==Proof==

Revision as of 00:12, 26 December 2010

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in topology.

Statement

Suppose X is a normal space (i.e., a topological space that is T1 and where any two disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose A is a closed subset of X, and f:A[0,1] is a continuous map. Then, there exists a continuous map g:X[0,1] such that the restriction of g to A is f.

Facts used

  1. Urysohn's lemma: This states that for, given two closed subsets A,B of a normal space X, there is a continuous function h:X[0,1] such that h(A)=0 and h(B)=1.
  2. Closedness is transitive: A closed subset (in the subspace topology) of a closed subset is closed in the whole space.

Proof

Note that since [0,1] is homeomorphic to [1,1], it suffices to prove the result replacing [0,1] with [1,1]. We will also freely use that any closed interval is homeomorphic to [0,1], so Urysohn's lemma can be stated replacing [0,1] by any closed interval.

Given: A normal space X. A closed subset A of X. A continuous function f:A[1,1].

To prove: There exists a continuous function g:X[1,1] such that the restriction of g to A is f.

Proof: We write f0=f.

The key part of the proof is the inductive portions (6)-(10). Steps (1)-(5) can be thought of as a special case of these; however, these steps are provided separately so that the full details can be seen in the base case before the general inductive setup is used.

Step no. Construction/assertion Given data used Previous steps used Facts used Explanation
1 Let C1=f1([1,1/3]) and D1=f1([1/3,1]) Existence of f:A[0,1] -- --
2 C1 and D1 are disjoint closed subsets of A f is continuous (1) inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed C1 and D1 are closed subsets of A since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under f are disjoint.
3 C1 and D1 are disjoint closed subsets of X A is closed in X (2) (2) By step (2), C1 and D1 are closed in A, which is closed in X. Thus, C1 and D1 are closed in X.
4 Construct a continuous function g1:X[1/3,1/3] such that g1(C1)=1/3 and g1(D1)=1/3 (3) (1) (Urysohn's lemma) Urysohn's lemma guarantees a continuous function h:X[0,1] such that h(C1)=0 and h(D1)=1. Define g1(x):=(2h(x)1)/3.
5 Define f1=f0g1 as a function on A. Note that f1 is a continuous function on A taking values in [2/3,2/3]. (f=f0 is continuous) (4) sum or difference of continuous functions on subsets of a topological space is continuous on their intersection. f1 is continuous since both f0 and g1 are continuous. For the range, note the following. For xA, there are three possibilities for the interval in which f0(x) lies: [1,1/3], [1/3,1/3], and [1/3,1]. In the first case, g1(x)=1/3, so f0(x)g1(x is in [1(1/3),1/3(1/3)]=[2/3,0]. In the second case, both f0(x) and g1(x) are in [1/3,1/3], so by the triangle inequality, the difference is in [2/3,2/3]. In the third case, g1(x)=1/3 so f0(x)g1(x) is in [1/31/3,11/3]=[0,2/3].
6 We proceed iteratively as follows: from the previous stage, we have a continuous function fi on the closed subset A taking values in [(2/3)i,(2/3)i].
7 Let Ci+1=fi1[(2/3)i,(1/3)(2/3)i] and Di+1=fi1[(1/3)(2/3)i,(2/3)i].
8 Ci+1 and Di+1 are disjoint closed subsets of A. (6): fi is continuous inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed C1 and D1 are closed subsets of A since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under f are disjoint.
9 Ci+1 and Di+1 are disjoint closed subsets of X A is closed in X (8) (2) (closed subsets of closed subsets are closed) By step (8), Ci+1 and Di+1 are closed in A, which is closed in X. Thus, Ci+1 and Di+1 are closed in X.
10 Find a continuous function gi+1:X[(1/3)(2/3)i,(1(3/(2/3)i] such that gi+1(Ci+1)=(1/3)(2/3)i and gi+1(Di+1)=(1/3)(2/3)i. (9) (1) (Urysohn's lemma) We use fact (1) to get a function to [0,1], then multiply by 2 and subtract 1 to get a function to [1,1], then scale it by the factor of (1/3)(2/3)i.
11 Define fi+1=figi+1. fi+1 is a continuous function on A taking values in [(2/3)i+1,(2/3)i+1]. (6), (10) (Same logic as for (5))
12 Define the following function g:X[1,1]: g=i=1gi. This function is well defined. (10) Note that the absolute value of gi is bounded by the geometric progression (1/3)+(1/3)(2/3)+(1/3)(2/3)2+=1. Similarly, the lower bound is 1. Further, since gn are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series gn converges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in [1,1].
13 The function g is continuous (10) This follows from the fact that each gi is continuous and the co-domain of the gis approaches zero. Fill this in later
14 g|A=f Let xA. Then, f1(x)=f(x)g1(x). Inductively, fn(x)=f(x)i=1ngi(x). Since the upper and lower bound on fn tend to zero as n, fn(x)0 as n. Thus, f(x)=i=1gi(x)=g(x) for xA.