Homotopy between composites associated in different ways: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
If we denote the homotopy by <math>H</math>, we want <math>H(t,0) = a(t), H(t,1) = b(t)</math> and <math>H(0,s) = H(1,s) = x_0</math>. This homotopy is explicitly given by:
If we denote the homotopy by <math>H</math>, we want <math>H(t,0) = a(t), H(t,1) = b(t)</math> and <math>H(0,s) = H(1,s) = x_0</math>. This homotopy is explicitly given by:


<math>H(t,s) = \lbrace\begin{array}{rl} f_1(2(1 + s)t), & 0 \le t \le (1 + s)/4 \\ f_2(4t - 1 - s), & (1 + s)/4 < t \le (2 + s)/4 \\ f_3(2t - 1 + s(2t - 2)), & (2 + s)/4 < t \le 1 \\\end{array}</math>
<math>H(t,s) = \lbrace\begin{array}{rl} f_1\left(\frac{4t}{1 + s}\right), & 0 \le t \le (1 + s)/4 \\ f_2(4t - 1 - s), & (1 + s)/4 < t \le (2 + s)/4 \\ f_3\left(\frac{4t - 2 - s}{2 - s}\right), & (2 + s)/4 < t \le 1 \\\end{array}</math>


===Graphical version===
===Graphical version===

Latest revision as of 22:08, 8 January 2011

Statement

Existential version

Suppose are loops based at a point in a topological space . We can consider two differently associated products of these three loops:

and are homotopic loops, i.e., they are in the same homotopy class of loops based at .

This version is essentially the associativity part of showing that the Fundamental group (?) of a based topological space is indeed a group.


Constructive/explicit version

We first note the explicit piecewise definitions of and :

and:

If we denote the homotopy by , we want and . This homotopy is explicitly given by:

Graphical version

Uniform version

This version is a little stronger than the other versions. Let be the loop space of , i.e., the space of all loops in based at under the compact-open topology. Then, consider the following two maps:

and:

Then, the maps and are homotopic maps. This is part of the proof that is a H-space, which is a homotopy variant of topological monoid.