Hausdorff not implies collectionwise Hausdorff: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A [[Hausdorff space]] need not be [[collectionwise Hausdorff space|collectionwise Hausdorff]]. | A [[Hausdorff space]] need not be [[collectionwise Hausdorff space|collectionwise Hausdorff]]. | ||
==Related facts== | |||
* [[Completely regular not implies collectionwise Hausdorff]] | |||
==Examples== | ==Examples== |
Latest revision as of 19:06, 23 January 2012
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property need not satisfy the second topological space property
View a complete list of topological space property non-implications | View a complete list of topological space property implications |Get help on looking up topological space property implications/non-implications
|
Statement
A Hausdorff space need not be collectionwise Hausdorff.
Related facts
Examples
- The Moore plane is an example of a completely regular space, which is not collectionwise Hausdorff. The bounding real line is an uncountable discrete set, but we cannot find a corresponding open cover.
- The Sorgenfrey plane is another example