Compactness is weakly hereditary: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
(New page: {{topospace metaproperty satisfaction}} ==Statement== ===Property-theoretic statement=== The property of topological spaces of being compact satisfies the [[metapr...)
 
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{topospace metaproperty satisfaction}}
{{topospace metaproperty satisfaction|
 
property = compact space|
metaproperty = weakly hereditary property of topological spaces}}
[[Difficulty level::1| ]]
==Statement==
==Statement==


Line 10: Line 12:


Any [[closed subset]] of a [[compact space]] is compact (when given the [[subspace topology]]).
Any [[closed subset]] of a [[compact space]] is compact (when given the [[subspace topology]]).
==Related facts==
* [[Hausdorff implies KC]]: In other words, every compact subset of a Hausdorff space is a [[closed subset]].
===Weakly hereditary for properties related to compactness===
* [[Paracompactness is weakly hereditary]]: Every [[closed subset]] of a paracompact space is paracompact.
* [[Orthocompactness is weakly hereditary]]
* [[Metacompactness is weakly hereditary]]


==Proof==
==Proof==
Line 15: Line 28:
===Proof in terms of open covers===
===Proof in terms of open covers===


Let <math>X</math> be a [[compact space]] and <math>A</math> be a [[closed subset]] (given the subspace topology). We need to prove that <math>A</math> is compact.
'''Given''': <math>X</math> a [[compact space]], <math>A</math> a [[closed subset]] (given the subspace topology)
 
'''To prove''': Consider an open cover of <math>A</math> by open sets <math>U_i</math> with <math>i \in I</math>, an indexing set. The <math>U_i</math> have a finite subcover.
 
'''Proof''':
 
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 ||By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets <math>V_i</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>V_i \cap A = U_i</math>, thus the union of the <math>V_i</math>s contains <math>A</math>. || <math>A</math> is a subspace of <math>X</math> || -- || -- ||
|-
| 2 || The <math>V_i</math>s along with <math>X \setminus A</math> form an open cover of <math>X</math> || <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay><math>X \setminus A</math> is open because <math>A</math> is closed. Further, since the union of all the <math>V_i</math>s contains <math>A</math>, that along with <math>X \setminus A</math> covers all of <math>X</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
| 3 || The open cover from step (2) has a finite subcover. In other words, there is a finite subcollection of the <math>V_i</math>s, that, along with <math>X \setminus A</math>, covers <math>X</math>. || <math>X</math> is compact || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
| 4 || By ''throwing out'' <math>X \setminus A</math>, we get a finite collection of <math>V_i</math>s whose union contains <math>A</math> || -- || -- || Step (3) ||
|-
| 5 || The corresponding <math>U_i</math> now form a finite subcover of the original cover of <math>A</math>. || -- || -- || Steps (1), (4) ||
|}
 
===Proof in terms of finite intersection property===
{{fillin}}


Let's start with an open cover of <math>A</math> by open sets <math>U_i</math> with <math>i \in I</math>, an indexing set. Our goal is to exhibit a finite subcover.
==References==


By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets <math>V_i</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>V_i \cap A = U_i</math>, thus the union of the <math>V_i</math>s contaiins <math>A</math>.
===Textbook references===


Since <math>A</math> is closed, we can ''throw in'' the open set <math>X \setminus A</math>, and get an open cover of the ''whole space''. But since the whole space is compact, this open cover has a finite subcover. In other words, there is a finite subcollection of the <math>V_i</math>s, that, possibly along with <math>X \setminus A</math>, covers the whole of <math>X</math>. By ''throwing out'' <math>X \setminus A</math>, we get a finite collection of <math>V_i</math>s whose union contains <math>A</math>. The corresponding <math>U_i</math> now form a finite subcover of the original cover of <math>A</math>.
* {{booklink-proved|Munkres}}, Page 165, Theorem 26.2, Chapter 3, Section 26
* {{booklink-proved|SingerThorpe}}, Page 12 (Theorem 4)

Latest revision as of 04:26, 30 January 2014

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., compact space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., weakly hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about compact space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of compact space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of compact space|Get more facts about weakly hereditary property of topological spaces

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of topological spaces of being compact satisfies the metaproperty of being weakly hereditary: in other words, it is inherited by closed subsets.

Verbal statement

Any closed subset of a compact space is compact (when given the subspace topology).

Related facts

Weakly hereditary for properties related to compactness


Proof

Proof in terms of open covers

Given: a compact space, a closed subset (given the subspace topology)

To prove: Consider an open cover of by open sets with , an indexing set. The have a finite subcover.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets of such that , thus the union of the s contains . is a subspace of -- --
2 The s along with form an open cover of is closed in -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
3 The open cover from step (2) has a finite subcover. In other words, there is a finite subcollection of the s, that, along with , covers . is compact -- Step (2)
4 By throwing out , we get a finite collection of s whose union contains -- -- Step (3)
5 The corresponding now form a finite subcover of the original cover of . -- -- Steps (1), (4)

Proof in terms of finite intersection property

Fill this in later

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, More info, Page 165, Theorem 26.2, Chapter 3, Section 26
  • Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. Thorpe, More info, Page 12 (Theorem 4)