Connectedness is not weakly hereditary: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{topospace metaproperty dissatisfaction| property = connected space| metaproperty = weakly hereditary property of topological spaces}} ==Statement== It is possible to have...") |
(→Proof) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Related facts== | ==Related facts== | ||
* [[ | * [[Connectedness is not hereditary]] includes more motivating discussion, the examples here are a subset of the examples on that page. | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
=== | ===Example using finite topological spaces=== | ||
For a counterexample, <math>A</math> must have at least two points, because the unique [[one-point space]] is connected. Therefore, <math>X</math> must have at least three points. | For a counterexample, <math>A</math> must have at least two points, because the unique [[one-point space]] is connected. Therefore, <math>X</math> must have at least three points. Below is one such example: | ||
<math>X = \{ -1, 0, 1 \}</math> | <math>X = \{ -1, 0, 1 \}</math> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 35: | ||
Basically, the point <math>0</math> serves the role of ''connecting'' the space, and removing it disconnects the space. | Basically, the point <math>0</math> serves the role of ''connecting'' the space, and removing it disconnects the space. | ||
===Example using the real line and a finite subset=== | |||
Consider the following example: | |||
* <math>X = \R</math> is the set of real numbers endowed with the usual Euclidean topology. | |||
* <math>A = \{ -1, 1 \}</math> is a subset of size two. | |||
<math>X</math> is connected. <math>A</math> is discrete in the subspace topology. Explicitly, for instance, <math>\{-1 \}</math> is the intersection of <math>A</math> with the open subset <math>(-\infty, 0)</math> of <math>X</math>, hence is open in <math>A</math>, and similarly <math>\{ 1 \} = A \cap (0, \infty)</math> and hence is open in <math>A</math>. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:59, 16 November 2015
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., connected space) not satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., weakly hereditary property of topological spaces).
View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions|Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for topological space properties
Get more facts about connected space|Get more facts about weakly hereditary property of topological spaces|
Statement
It is possible to have a nonempty topological space and a nonempty closed subset of such that:
- is a connected space
- is not a connected space under the subspace topology from .
Related facts
- Connectedness is not hereditary includes more motivating discussion, the examples here are a subset of the examples on that page.
Proof
Example using finite topological spaces
For a counterexample, must have at least two points, because the unique one-point space is connected. Therefore, must have at least three points. Below is one such example:
with the topology defined as follows: the open subsets are:
Or equivalently, the closed subsets are:
Clearly, is connected: the only nonempty closed subset containing is all of , and therefore cannot be expressed as a union of two disjoint nonempty open subsets. In fact, framed more strongly, is an irreducible space.
Consider to be the subset of with the subspace topology. has a discrete topology, and in particular, is a union of disjoint closed subsets and . Therefore, it is not connected.
Basically, the point serves the role of connecting the space, and removing it disconnects the space.
Example using the real line and a finite subset
Consider the following example:
- is the set of real numbers endowed with the usual Euclidean topology.
- is a subset of size two.
is connected. is discrete in the subspace topology. Explicitly, for instance, is the intersection of with the open subset of , hence is open in , and similarly and hence is open in .