Five lemma: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
m (3 revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


* If <math>f_2</math> and <math>f_4</math> are injective and <math>f_1</math> is surjective, then <math>f_3</math> is injective
* If <math>f_2</math> and <math>f_4</math> are injective and <math>f_1</math> is surjective, then <math>f_3</math> is injective
* If <math>f_2</math> and <math>f_4</math/ are surjective and <math>f_5</math> is injective then <math>f_3</math> is surjective
* If <math>f_2</math> and <math>f_4</math> are surjective and <math>f_5</math> is injective then <math>f_3</math> is surjective
* if <math>f_1,f_2,f_4,f_5</math> are isomorphisms, then <math>f_3</math> is also an isomorphism
* if <math>f_1,f_2,f_4,f_5</math> are isomorphisms, then <math>f_3</math> is also an isomorphism

Latest revision as of 19:44, 11 May 2008

This is a lemma involving commutative diagrams that can be proved by means of diagram chasing

Let A1A2A3A4A5 and B1B2B2B4B5 be exact sequences of homomorphisms. Suppose there are maps fi:AiBi such that the diagram of all these maps commutes. Then the following are true:

  • If f2 and f4 are injective and f1 is surjective, then f3 is injective
  • If f2 and f4 are surjective and f5 is injective then f3 is surjective
  • if f1,f2,f4,f5 are isomorphisms, then f3 is also an isomorphism