Urysohn's lemma: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Let <math>X</math> be a [[normal space]] (i.e., a topological space that is [[T1 space|T1]] and where disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose <math>A,B</math> are disjoint [[closed subset]]s of <math>X</math>. Then, there exists a continuous function <math>f:X \to [0,1]</math> such that <math>f(a) = 0</math> for all <math>a \in A</math>, and <math>f(b) = 1</math> for all <math>b \in B</math>. | Let <math>X</math> be a [[fact about::normal space]] (i.e., a topological space that is [[T1 space|T1]] and where disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose <math>A,B</math> are disjoint [[closed subset]]s of <math>X</math>. Then, there exists a continuous function <math>f:X \to [0,1]</math> such that <math>f(a) = 0</math> for all <math>a \in A</math>, and <math>f(b) = 1</math> for all <math>b \in B</math>. | ||
Note that the [[T1 space|T1]] assumption is not necessary, so Urysohn's lemma also holds for [[normal-minus-Hausdorff space]]s, which is what many point set topologists are referring to when they use the term ''normal space''. | |||
==Related facts== | ==Related facts== | ||
Latest revision as of 00:10, 26 December 2010
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in topology.
Statement
Let be a Normal space (?) (i.e., a topological space that is T1 and where disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose are disjoint closed subsets of . Then, there exists a continuous function such that for all , and for all .
Note that the T1 assumption is not necessary, so Urysohn's lemma also holds for normal-minus-Hausdorff spaces, which is what many point set topologists are referring to when they use the term normal space.