Cup product: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (4 revisions) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{binary operation on cohomology}} | |||
''This uses the [[Alexander-Whitney map]]'' | ''This uses the [[Alexander-Whitney map]]'' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
It needs to be checked that the cochain defined in this manner is indeed a cocycle, and that its cohomology class is independent of the choices for representatives <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math>. | It needs to be checked that the cochain defined in this manner is indeed a cocycle, and that its cohomology class is independent of the choices for representatives <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math>. | ||
The cup product of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> is denoted by: | |||
<math>a \smile b</math> | |||
==Importance== | ==Importance== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 11 May 2008
This article describes a binary operation involving the cohomology groups of one or more topological spaces
This uses the Alexander-Whitney map
Definition
Let be a topological space and a commutative ring. The cup product can be viewed as a bilinear map:
or equivalently as a linear map:
defined as follows. Let . Pick representing cocycles for and for . We will now produce an -cocycle.
To do this, let be any -simplex in . Then via the diagonal embedding of in , becomes an -simplex in , and the Alexander-Whitney map then sends to an element of . Look at the component for , and evaluate on this element. This gives a scalar (element of ). This scalar is the value on the simplex .
It needs to be checked that the cochain defined in this manner is indeed a cocycle, and that its cohomology class is independent of the choices for representatives and .
The cup product of and is denoted by:
Importance
Further information: Cohomology ring of a topological space
The cup product does not depend specifically on the Alexander-Whitney map, but rather on the Alexander-Whitney map upto chain homotopy, and by the theory of acyclic models, there is only one such map upto chain homotopy. Thus, it yields a natural multiplication on the direct sum of all the cohomology groups.
It turns out that this multiplication is associative on the nose for the usual choice of Alexander-Whitney map (for other choices, it is associative only upto homotopy). Also, multiplication is graded-commutative (sometimes called supercommutative) if the ground ring is commutative.