Cup product: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
m (4 revisions)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{binary operation on cohomology}}
''This uses the [[Alexander-Whitney map]]''
''This uses the [[Alexander-Whitney map]]''


Line 17: Line 19:
It needs to be checked that the cochain defined in this manner is indeed a cocycle, and that its cohomology class is independent of the choices for representatives <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math>.
It needs to be checked that the cochain defined in this manner is indeed a cocycle, and that its cohomology class is independent of the choices for representatives <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math>.


The cup product of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> is denoted by:
<math>a \smile b</math>
==Importance==
==Importance==



Latest revision as of 19:43, 11 May 2008

This article describes a binary operation involving the cohomology groups of one or more topological spaces

This uses the Alexander-Whitney map

Definition

Let X be a topological space and R a commutative ring. The cup product can be viewed as a bilinear map:

Hi(X;R)×Hj(X;R)Hi+j(X;R)

or equivalently as a linear map:

Hi(X;R)Hj(X;R)Hi+j(X;R)

defined as follows. Let aHi(X;R),bHj(X;R). Pick representing cocycles α for a and β for b. We will now produce an (i+j)-cocycle.

To do this, let s be any (i+j)-simplex in X. Then via the diagonal embedding of X in X×X, s becomes an (i+j)-simplex in X×X, and the Alexander-Whitney map then sends s to an element of Sing.(X)Sing.(X). Look at the component for Singi(X)Singj(X), and evaluate αβ on this element. This gives a scalar (element of R). This scalar is the value on the simplex s.

It needs to be checked that the cochain defined in this manner is indeed a cocycle, and that its cohomology class is independent of the choices for representatives α and β.

The cup product of a and b is denoted by:

ab

Importance

Further information: Cohomology ring of a topological space

The cup product does not depend specifically on the Alexander-Whitney map, but rather on the Alexander-Whitney map upto chain homotopy, and by the theory of acyclic models, there is only one such map upto chain homotopy. Thus, it yields a natural multiplication on the direct sum of all the cohomology groups.

It turns out that this multiplication is associative on the nose for the usual choice of Alexander-Whitney map (for other choices, it is associative only upto homotopy). Also, multiplication is graded-commutative (sometimes called supercommutative) if the ground ring is commutative.