Hurewicz theorem: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{factrelatedtos|homotopy group}}
==Statement==
==Statement==


If <math>X</math> is a <math>n</math>-[[multiply connected space|connected space]] with <math>n \ge 2</math> (viz its first <math>n</math> [[homotopy group]]s vanish) then the [[Hurewicz map]] on the <math>(n+1)^{th}</math> homotopy group is an isomorphism:
===In terms of the Hurewicz homomorphism: absolute version===
 
If <math>X</math> is a <math>n</math>-[[fact about::multiply connected space|connected space]] with <math>n \ge 1</math> (viz its first <math>n</math> [[homotopy group]]s vanish) then the [[Hurewicz map]] on the <math>(n+1)^{th}</math> homotopy group is an isomorphism:
 
<math>\pi_{n+1}(X,x_0) \to \tilde{H}_{n+1}(X) = H_{n+1}(X)</math>
 
and moreover, all the reduced homology groups up to <math>n</math> are zero. In particular, <math>\tilde{H}_0(X) = 0</math> and <math>H_k(X) = 0</math> for <math>1 \le k \le n</math>.
 
In the case <math>n = 0</math>, so that <math>X</math> is a [[path-connected space]] but nothing more is known, the Hurewicz homomorphism from the [[fact about::fundamental group]] to the [[first homology group]]:
 
<math>\pi_1(X,x_0) \to H_1(X)</math>
 
is surjective and has kernel precisely the [[derived subgroup]] of <math>\pi_1(X,x_0)</math>, so <math>H_1(X)</math> is isomorphic to the abelianization of <math>\pi_1(X,x_0)</math>.
 
===In terms of first non-vanishing member: absolute version===
 
Suppose <math>X</math> is a [[fact about::path-connected space]] that is [[fact about::simply connected space|simply connected]]. In particular, <math>\pi_0(X)</math> and <math>\pi_1(X)</math> are both ''trivial'' (the one-point set and the trivial group respectively). Then:
 
# The smallest <math>k</math> for which <math>\pi_k(X)</math> is nontrivial is the same as the smallest <math>k</math> for which <math>\tilde{H}_k(X)</math> is nontrivial.
# Both of these groups are isomorphic, and the Hurewicz homomorphism gives an isomorphism.
 
In the case that we are only given that <math>X</math> is a [[path-connected space]], <math>H_1(X) \cong \pi_1(X)/[\pi_1(X),\pi_1(X)]</math> and the Hurewicz homomorphism descends to this natural identification.


<math>\pi_{n+1}(X,x_0) \to \tilde{H}_{n+1}(X)</math>
===Relative version===


and moreover, all the reduced homology groups upto <math>n</math> are zero.
{{fillin}}

Latest revision as of 01:32, 21 December 2010

This fact is related to: homotopy groups

Statement

In terms of the Hurewicz homomorphism: absolute version

If X is a n-connected space with n1 (viz its first n homotopy groups vanish) then the Hurewicz map on the (n+1)th homotopy group is an isomorphism:

πn+1(X,x0)H~n+1(X)=Hn+1(X)

and moreover, all the reduced homology groups up to n are zero. In particular, H~0(X)=0 and Hk(X)=0 for 1kn.

In the case n=0, so that X is a path-connected space but nothing more is known, the Hurewicz homomorphism from the Fundamental group (?) to the first homology group:

π1(X,x0)H1(X)

is surjective and has kernel precisely the derived subgroup of π1(X,x0), so H1(X) is isomorphic to the abelianization of π1(X,x0).

In terms of first non-vanishing member: absolute version

Suppose X is a Path-connected space (?) that is simply connected. In particular, π0(X) and π1(X) are both trivial (the one-point set and the trivial group respectively). Then:

  1. The smallest k for which πk(X) is nontrivial is the same as the smallest k for which H~k(X) is nontrivial.
  2. Both of these groups are isomorphic, and the Hurewicz homomorphism gives an isomorphism.

In the case that we are only given that X is a path-connected space, H1(X)π1(X)/[π1(X),π1(X)] and the Hurewicz homomorphism descends to this natural identification.

Relative version

Fill this in later