Mayer-Vietoris homology sequence: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


<math>(g,h) \mapsto H_n(k)g - H_n(l)h</math>
<math>(g,h) \mapsto H_n(k)g - H_n(l)h</math>
==Interpretation in different homology theories==
===For singular homology===
For singular homology, the Mayer-Vietoris homology sequence can be viewed as the long exact sequence of homology of a [[short exact sequence of chain complexes]], namely:
<math>sd^mC_n(U \cap V) \to sd^mC_n(U) \oplus sd^mC_n(V) \to sd^m(C_n(X)</math>
where <math>sd</math> denotes the [[barycentric subdivision operator]]. Since <math>sd</math> is [[chain-homotopic chain maps|homotopic]] to the identity map, the homologies of this are the homologies of the original chain complexes.
The rough idea is that by subdividing sufficiently, we can make sure that each simplex goes either entirely within <math>U</math> or entirely within <math>V</math>.
===For axiomatic homology===

Revision as of 22:35, 24 October 2007

This article defines a long exact sequence of homology groups, for topological spaces or pairs of topological spaces

Definition

Suppose X is a topological space, and U and V are subsets of X such that the union of the interiors of U and V cover X. Then we get a long exact sequence of homology:

Hn(UV)Hn(U)Hn(V)Hn(X)Hn1(UV)

where the maps are as follows. Let i,j be the inclusions from UV to U and k,l be the inclusions from U,V into X.

Then the map from the homology of UV is:

f(Hn(i)(f),Hn(j)(f))

And the map from Hn(U)Hn(V) is:

(g,h)Hn(k)gHn(l)h

Interpretation in different homology theories

For singular homology

For singular homology, the Mayer-Vietoris homology sequence can be viewed as the long exact sequence of homology of a short exact sequence of chain complexes, namely:

sdmCn(UV)sdmCn(U)sdmCn(V)sdm(Cn(X)

where sd denotes the barycentric subdivision operator. Since sd is homotopic to the identity map, the homologies of this are the homologies of the original chain complexes.

The rough idea is that by subdividing sufficiently, we can make sure that each simplex goes either entirely within U or entirely within V.

For axiomatic homology