Mapping cylinder: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Let <math>f:X \to Y</math> be a function. Then the '''mapping cylinder''' of <math>f</math> is defined as the quotient of the disjoint union of <math>X \times I</math> with <math>Y</math>, modulo the equivalence relation: | Let <math>f:X \to Y</math> be a function. Then the '''mapping cylinder''' of <math>f</math> is defined as the quotient of the disjoint union of <math>X \times I</math> with <math>Y</math>, modulo the equivalence relation: | ||
<math>(x,1) \ | <math>\! (x,1) \sim f(x)</math> | ||
Here, <math>I = [0,1]</math> is the [[unit interval]]. | |||
==Facts== | ==Facts== | ||
Revision as of 23:10, 9 October 2010
Definition
Let be a function. Then the mapping cylinder of is defined as the quotient of the disjoint union of with , modulo the equivalence relation:
Here, is the unit interval.
Facts
The significance of the mapping cylinder is that it is homotopy-equivalent to , and moreover the inclusion of (say via ) in the mapping cylinder is equivalent to the map .
Thus, starting from an arbitrary continuous map, we have got a homotopy-equivalent map which is an inclusion.
Further, the inclusion of in the mapping cylinder is a cofibration, which makes it even nicer.
Relation with other constructions
More general constructions
| Name of construction | Description of construction | How the mapping cylinder is a special case |
|---|---|---|
| double mapping cylinder | spaces , with continuous maps from to and to , we take and collapse and onto and via the continuous maps | Case where and the map is the identity map. |
More specific constructions
| Name of construction | How it arises as a special case |
|---|---|
| cone space | Set as a one-point space and as the map sending everything to one point. |