Universal coefficient theorem for homology: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
(Created page with "==Statement== ===For coefficients in an abelian group=== Suppose <math>M</math> is an abelian group and <math>X</math> is a topological space. The '''universal coeffici...")
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
Second, it states that this short exact sequence splits, so we obtain:
Second, it states that this short exact sequence splits, so we obtain:


<math>H_n(X;M) \cong (H_n(X;\mathbb{Z}) \otimes M) \oplus \operatorname{Tor}(H_{n-1}(X);M)</math>
<math>H_n(X;M) \cong (H_n(X;\mathbb{Z}) \otimes M) \oplus \operatorname{Tor}(H_{n-1}(X;\mathbb{Z}),M)</math>
 
===For coefficients in a module over a principal ideal domain===
 
{{fillin}}
 
==Related facts==
 
* [[Universal coefficients theorem for cohomology]]
* [[Dual universal coefficients theorem]]
* [[Kunneth formula for homology]]
* [[Kunneth formula for cohomology]]
 
==Particular cases==
 
===Case of free abelian groups===
 
If <math>H_{n-1}(X;\mathbb{Z})</math> is a free abelian group, then we get:
 
<math>H_n(X;M) \cong H_n(X;\mathbb{Z}) \otimes M</math>
 
As a corollary, if all the homology groups are free abelian, then the above holds for all <math>n</math>.

Revision as of 15:56, 27 July 2011

Statement

For coefficients in an abelian group

Suppose M is an abelian group and X is a topological space. The universal coefficients theorem relates the homology groups for X with integral coefficients (i.e., with coefficients in Z) to the homology groups with coefficients in M.

The theorem comes in two parts:

First, it states that there is a natural short exact sequence:

0Hn(X;Z)MHn(X;M)Tor(Hn1(X);M)0

Second, it states that this short exact sequence splits, so we obtain:

Hn(X;M)(Hn(X;Z)M)Tor(Hn1(X;Z),M)

For coefficients in a module over a principal ideal domain

Fill this in later

Related facts

Particular cases

Case of free abelian groups

If Hn1(X;Z) is a free abelian group, then we get:

Hn(X;M)Hn(X;Z)M

As a corollary, if all the homology groups are free abelian, then the above holds for all n.