Hurewicz map: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
m (1 revision)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
<math>\eta:\Delta^n \to S^n</math>
<math>\eta:\Delta^n \to S^n</math>


which essentially uses the identification of <math>S^n</math> with the boundary of <math>\Delta^n</math>.  
which essentially uses the identification of <math>S^n</math> with the quotient of <math>\Delta^n</math> by the collapse of its boundary to a single point.  


Now given any <math>f \in \pi_n(X,x_0)</math>, consider <math>f \circ \eta</math>. This gives a <math>n</math>-singular chain in <math>X</math>, and its homology class is precisely the element we are looking for.
Now given any <math>f \in \pi_n(X,x_0)</math>, consider <math>f \circ \eta</math>. This gives a <math>n</math>-singular chain in <math>X</math>, and its homology class is precisely the element we are looking for.

Revision as of 03:57, 24 December 2010

Definition

Let X be a path-connected space. For n a positive integer, the nth Hurewicz map based at x0 of X is a map:

πn(X,x0)Hn(X)

where πn(X,x0) is the nth homotopy group, and Hn(X) is the nth singular homology group.

The map is defined as follows. First define a map:

η:ΔnSn

which essentially uses the identification of Sn with the quotient of Δn by the collapse of its boundary to a single point.

Now given any fπn(X,x0), consider fη. This gives a n-singular chain in X, and its homology class is precisely the element we are looking for.

Here is an alternative description of the map. We use the fact that f:SnX induces a map between Hn(Sn) and Hn(X). But Hn(Sn)=Z and we can thus simply look at the image of the generator of this, to give an element in Hn(X).

Facts