Compactness is weakly hereditary: Difference between revisions
m (2 revisions) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Proof in terms of open covers=== | ===Proof in terms of open covers=== | ||
'''Given''': <math>X</math> a [[compact space]], <math>A</math> a [[closed subset]] (given the subspace topology) | |||
'''To prove''': <math>A</math> is compact | |||
By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets <math>V_i</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>V_i \cap A = U_i</math>, thus the union of the <math>V_i</math>s | '''Proof''': Let's start with an open cover of <math>A</math> by open sets <math>U_i</math> with <math>i \in I</math>, an indexing set. Our goal is to exhibit a finite subcover. | ||
By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets <math>V_i</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>V_i \cap A = U_i</math>, thus the union of the <math>V_i</math>s contains <math>A</math>. | |||
Since <math>A</math> is closed, we can ''throw in'' the open set <math>X \setminus A</math>, and get an open cover of the ''whole space''. But since the whole space is compact, this open cover has a finite subcover. In other words, there is a finite subcollection of the <math>V_i</math>s, that, possibly along with <math>X \setminus A</math>, covers the whole of <math>X</math>. By ''throwing out'' <math>X \setminus A</math>, we get a finite collection of <math>V_i</math>s whose union contains <math>A</math>. The corresponding <math>U_i</math> now form a finite subcover of the original cover of <math>A</math>. | Since <math>A</math> is closed, we can ''throw in'' the open set <math>X \setminus A</math>, and get an open cover of the ''whole space''. But since the whole space is compact, this open cover has a finite subcover. In other words, there is a finite subcollection of the <math>V_i</math>s, that, possibly along with <math>X \setminus A</math>, covers the whole of <math>X</math>. By ''throwing out'' <math>X \setminus A</math>, we get a finite collection of <math>V_i</math>s whose union contains <math>A</math>. The corresponding <math>U_i</math> now form a finite subcover of the original cover of <math>A</math>. | ||
===Proof in terms of finite intersection property=== | |||
{{fillin}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:51, 20 July 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property satisfying a topological space metaproperty
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
|
Property "Page" (as page type) with input value "{{{property}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Page" (as page type) with input value "{{{metaproperty}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
Statement
Property-theoretic statement
The property of topological spaces of being compact satisfies the metaproperty of being weakly hereditary: in other words, it is inherited by closed subsets.
Verbal statement
Any closed subset of a compact space is compact (when given the subspace topology).
Proof
Proof in terms of open covers
Given: a compact space, a closed subset (given the subspace topology)
To prove: is compact
Proof: Let's start with an open cover of by open sets with , an indexing set. Our goal is to exhibit a finite subcover.
By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets of such that , thus the union of the s contains .
Since is closed, we can throw in the open set , and get an open cover of the whole space. But since the whole space is compact, this open cover has a finite subcover. In other words, there is a finite subcollection of the s, that, possibly along with , covers the whole of . By throwing out , we get a finite collection of s whose union contains . The corresponding now form a finite subcover of the original cover of .
Proof in terms of finite intersection property
Fill this in later
References
Textbook references
- Topology (2nd edition) by James R. MunkresMore info, Page 165 (Theorem 26.2)
- Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. ThorpeMore info, Page 12 (Theorem 4)