Tietze extension theorem: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


# Let <math>C_1 = f^{-1}([-1,-1/3])</math> and <math>D_1 = f^{-1}([1/3,1])</math>. These are both closed subsets of <math>X</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint by definition. So, by fact (1), there exists a function <math>g_1: X \to [-1/3,1/3]</math> such that <math>g_1(C_1) = -1/3</math> and <math>g_1(D_1) = 1/3</math>.
# Let <math>C_1 = f^{-1}([-1,-1/3])</math> and <math>D_1 = f^{-1}([1/3,1])</math>. These are both closed subsets of <math>X</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint by definition. So, by fact (1), there exists a function <math>g_1: X \to [-1/3,1/3]</math> such that <math>g_1(C_1) = -1/3</math> and <math>g_1(D_1) = 1/3</math>.
# Define <math>h_1 = f - g_1</math> as a function on <math>A</math>. Note that <math>h_1</math> is a function on <math>A</math> taking values in [-2/3,2/3]</math>. Iteratively, we proceed as follows:
# Define <math>h_1 = f - g_1</math> as a function on <math>A</math>. Note that <math>h_1</math> is a function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>[-2/3,2/3]</math>. Iteratively, we proceed as follows:
## At any stage, we have <math>g_i:X \to [-(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1},(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1}]</math>.
## At any stage, we have a continuous map <math>g_i:X \to [-(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1},(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1}]</math>.
## We define <math>h_i = h_{i-1} - g_i</math> on the closed subset <math>A</math>. <math>h_i</math> is thus a function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>[-(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>.
## We define <math>h_i = h_{i-1} - g_i</math> on the closed subset <math>A</math>. <math>h_i</math> is thus a function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>[-(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>.
## Consider the subsets <math>C_i = h_i^{-1}[-(2/3)^i,-(1/3)(2/3)^i]</math> and <math>D_i = h_i^{-1}[(1/3)(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. Note that both <math>C_i</math> and <math>D_i</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> (since <math>h_i</math> is continuous) and hence in <math>X</math>, since <math>A</math> is closed in <mah>X</math>.
## Consider the subsets <math>C_i = h_i^{-1}[-(2/3)^i,-(1/3)(2/3)^i]</math> and <math>D_i = h_i^{-1}[(1/3)(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. Note that both <math>C_i</math> and <math>D_i</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> (since <math>h_i</math> is continuous) and hence in <math>X</math>, since <math>A</math> is closed in <mah>X</math>.

Revision as of 04:31, 17 July 2009

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in topology.

Statement

Suppose is a normal space (i.e., a topological space that is T1 and where any two disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose is a closed subset of , and is a continuous map. Then, there exists a continuous map such that the restriction of to is .

Facts used

  1. Urysohn's lemma: This states that for, given two closed subsets of a normal space , there is a continuous function such that and .

Proof

Note that since is homeomorphic to , it suffices to prove the result replacing with . We will also freely use that any closed interval is homeomorphic to , so Urysohn's lemma can be stated replacing by any closed interval.

Given: A normal space . A closed subset of . A continuous function .

To prove: There exists a continuous function such that the restriction of to is .

Proof:

  1. Let and . These are both closed subsets of since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint by definition. So, by fact (1), there exists a function such that and .
  2. Define as a function on . Note that is a function on taking values in . Iteratively, we proceed as follows:
    1. At any stage, we have a continuous map .
    2. We define on the closed subset . is thus a function on taking values in .
    3. Consider the subsets and . Note that both and are closed subsets of (since is continuous) and hence in , since is closed in <mah>X</math>.
    4. By fact (1), find a function such that and .
  3. Define as . This sum is well-defined at each point and takes values in : Note that the absolute value of is bounded by the geometric progression . Similarly, the lower bound is . Further, since are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series coverges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in .
  4. The function is continuous: This follows from the fact that each is continuous and the co-domain of the s approaches zero. Fill this in later
  5. : Let . Then, . Inductively, . Since the upper and lower bound on tend to zero as , as . Thus, for .