Tietze extension theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Proof) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
# Let <math>C_1 = f^{-1}([-1,-1/3])</math> and <math>D_1 = f^{-1}([1/3,1])</math>. These are both closed subsets of <math>X</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint by definition. So, by fact (1), there exists a function <math>g_1: X \to [-1/3,1/3]</math> such that <math>g_1(C_1) = -1/3</math> and <math>g_1(D_1) = 1/3</math>. | # Let <math>C_1 = f^{-1}([-1,-1/3])</math> and <math>D_1 = f^{-1}([1/3,1])</math>. These are both closed subsets of <math>X</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint by definition. So, by fact (1), there exists a function <math>g_1: X \to [-1/3,1/3]</math> such that <math>g_1(C_1) = -1/3</math> and <math>g_1(D_1) = 1/3</math>. | ||
# Define <math>h_1 = f - g_1</math> as a function on <math>A</math>. Note that <math>h_1</math> is a function on <math>A</math> taking values in [-2/3,2/3]</math>. Iteratively, we proceed as follows: | # Define <math>h_1 = f - g_1</math> as a function on <math>A</math>. Note that <math>h_1</math> is a function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>[-2/3,2/3]</math>. Iteratively, we proceed as follows: | ||
## At any stage, we have <math>g_i:X \to [-(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1},(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1}]</math>. | ## At any stage, we have a continuous map <math>g_i:X \to [-(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1},(1/3)(2/3)^{i-1}]</math>. | ||
## We define <math>h_i = h_{i-1} - g_i</math> on the closed subset <math>A</math>. <math>h_i</math> is thus a function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>[-(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. | ## We define <math>h_i = h_{i-1} - g_i</math> on the closed subset <math>A</math>. <math>h_i</math> is thus a function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>[-(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. | ||
## Consider the subsets <math>C_i = h_i^{-1}[-(2/3)^i,-(1/3)(2/3)^i]</math> and <math>D_i = h_i^{-1}[(1/3)(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. Note that both <math>C_i</math> and <math>D_i</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> (since <math>h_i</math> is continuous) and hence in <math>X</math>, since <math>A</math> is closed in <mah>X</math>. | ## Consider the subsets <math>C_i = h_i^{-1}[-(2/3)^i,-(1/3)(2/3)^i]</math> and <math>D_i = h_i^{-1}[(1/3)(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. Note that both <math>C_i</math> and <math>D_i</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> (since <math>h_i</math> is continuous) and hence in <math>X</math>, since <math>A</math> is closed in <mah>X</math>. | ||
Revision as of 04:31, 17 July 2009
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in topology.
Statement
Suppose is a normal space (i.e., a topological space that is T1 and where any two disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose is a closed subset of , and is a continuous map. Then, there exists a continuous map such that the restriction of to is .
Facts used
- Urysohn's lemma: This states that for, given two closed subsets of a normal space , there is a continuous function such that and .
Proof
Note that since is homeomorphic to , it suffices to prove the result replacing with . We will also freely use that any closed interval is homeomorphic to , so Urysohn's lemma can be stated replacing by any closed interval.
Given: A normal space . A closed subset of . A continuous function .
To prove: There exists a continuous function such that the restriction of to is .
Proof:
- Let and . These are both closed subsets of since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint by definition. So, by fact (1), there exists a function such that and .
- Define as a function on . Note that is a function on taking values in . Iteratively, we proceed as follows:
- At any stage, we have a continuous map .
- We define on the closed subset . is thus a function on taking values in .
- Consider the subsets and . Note that both and are closed subsets of (since is continuous) and hence in , since is closed in <mah>X</math>.
- By fact (1), find a function such that and .
- Define as . This sum is well-defined at each point and takes values in : Note that the absolute value of is bounded by the geometric progression . Similarly, the lower bound is . Further, since are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series coverges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in .
- The function is continuous: This follows from the fact that each is continuous and the co-domain of the s approaches zero. Fill this in later
- : Let . Then, . Inductively, . Since the upper and lower bound on tend to zero as , as . Thus, for .