Homotopy between composites associated in different ways: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
(Created page with '==Statement== ===Existential version=== Suppose <math>f_1,f_2,f_3</math> are loops based at a point <math>x_0</math> in a topological space <math>X</math>. We can consi...')
 
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


===Constructive/explicit version===
===Constructive/explicit version===
We first note the explicit piecewise definitions of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>:
<math>a = \lbrace\begin{array}{rl} f_1(4t), & 0 \le t \le 1/4 \\ f_2(4t - 1), & 1/4 < t \le 1/2 \\ f_3(2t - 1), & 1/2 < t \le 1 \\\end{array}</math>
and:
<math>b = \lbrace\begin{array}{rl} f_1(2t), & 0 \le t \le 1/2 \\ f_2(4t - 2), & 1/2 < t \le 3/4 \\ f_3(4t - 3), & 3/4 < t \le 1 \\\end{array}</math>
If we denote the homotopy by <math>H</math>, we want <math>H(t,0) = a(t), H(t,1) = b(t)</math> and <math>H(0,s) = H(1,s) = x_0</math>. This homotopy is explicitly given by {{fillin}}
===Graphical version===


{{fillin}}
{{fillin}}

Revision as of 18:57, 18 December 2010

Statement

Existential version

Suppose f1,f2,f3 are loops based at a point x0 in a topological space X. We can consider two differently associated products of these three loops:

a=(f1*f2)*f3,b=f1*(f2*f3)

a and b are homotopic loops, i.e., they are in the same homotopy class of loops based at x0.

Constructive/explicit version

We first note the explicit piecewise definitions of a and b:

a={f1(4t),0t1/4f2(4t1),1/4<t1/2f3(2t1),1/2<t1

and:

b={f1(2t),0t1/2f2(4t2),1/2<t3/4f3(4t3),3/4<t1

If we denote the homotopy by H, we want H(t,0)=a(t),H(t,1)=b(t) and H(0,s)=H(1,s)=x0. This homotopy is explicitly given by Fill this in later

Graphical version

Fill this in later