Homotopy between composites associated in different ways: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '==Statement== ===Existential version=== Suppose <math>f_1,f_2,f_3</math> are loops based at a point <math>x_0</math> in a topological space <math>X</math>. We can consi...') |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Constructive/explicit version=== | ===Constructive/explicit version=== | ||
We first note the explicit piecewise definitions of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>: | |||
<math>a = \lbrace\begin{array}{rl} f_1(4t), & 0 \le t \le 1/4 \\ f_2(4t - 1), & 1/4 < t \le 1/2 \\ f_3(2t - 1), & 1/2 < t \le 1 \\\end{array}</math> | |||
and: | |||
<math>b = \lbrace\begin{array}{rl} f_1(2t), & 0 \le t \le 1/2 \\ f_2(4t - 2), & 1/2 < t \le 3/4 \\ f_3(4t - 3), & 3/4 < t \le 1 \\\end{array}</math> | |||
If we denote the homotopy by <math>H</math>, we want <math>H(t,0) = a(t), H(t,1) = b(t)</math> and <math>H(0,s) = H(1,s) = x_0</math>. This homotopy is explicitly given by {{fillin}} | |||
===Graphical version=== | |||
{{fillin}} | {{fillin}} |
Revision as of 18:57, 18 December 2010
Statement
Existential version
Suppose are loops based at a point in a topological space . We can consider two differently associated products of these three loops:
and are homotopic loops, i.e., they are in the same homotopy class of loops based at .
Constructive/explicit version
We first note the explicit piecewise definitions of and :
and:
If we denote the homotopy by , we want and . This homotopy is explicitly given by Fill this in later
Graphical version
Fill this in later