Irreducible and Hausdorff implies one-point space: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
(Created page with "==Statement== Suppose <math>X</math> is a non-empty topological space that is both an uses property satisfaction of::irreducible space and a [[uses property satisfact...")
 
 
Line 10: Line 10:
==Proof==
==Proof==


We prove a somewhat modified form: we prove that an irreducible space containing two distinct points cannot be Hausdorff.
We prove a somewhat modified form: we prove that an Hausdorff space containing two distinct points cannot be irreducible.


{{fillin}}
'''Given''': A non-empty topological space <math>X</math> that is Hausdorff and has at least two points. Say <math>x,y</math> are two distinct points of <math>X</math>.
 
'''To prove''': <math>X</math> is not irreducible, i.e., it contains two non-empty open subsets with empty intersection.
 
'''Proof''': Use the definition of Hausdorff to find non-empty open subsets <math>U \ni x, V \ni y</math> that have empty intersection. This completes the proof.

Latest revision as of 19:59, 26 January 2012

Statement

Suppose is a non-empty topological space that is both an irreducible space and a Hausdorff space. Then, must be a one-point space.

Related facts

Similar facts

Proof

We prove a somewhat modified form: we prove that an Hausdorff space containing two distinct points cannot be irreducible.

Given: A non-empty topological space that is Hausdorff and has at least two points. Say are two distinct points of .

To prove: is not irreducible, i.e., it contains two non-empty open subsets with empty intersection.

Proof: Use the definition of Hausdorff to find non-empty open subsets that have empty intersection. This completes the proof.