Order topology: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
(Created page with "==Definition== Suppose <math>X</math> is a linearly ordered set (i.e., a set equipped with a total ordering where we denote the strict order by <math><</math>. Then, the ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
* For <math>a \in X</math>, sets <math>(-\infty,a)</math>, defined as sets of the form <math>\{ x \mid x < a \}</math>
* For <math>a \in X</math>, sets <math>(-\infty,a)</math>, defined as sets of the form <math>\{ x \mid x < a \}</math>
* For <math>a,b \in X</math> with <math>a < b</math>, sets <math>(a,b)</math>, defined as sets of the form <math>\{ x \mid a < x < b \}</math>
* For <math>a,b \in X</math> with <math>a < b</math>, sets <math>(a,b)</math>, defined as sets of the form <math>\{ x \mid a < x < b \}</math>
==Type of resultant topological space==
We use the term [[linearly orderable space]] for a topological space that arises by taking the order topology on a linearly ordered set.

Revision as of 02:57, 27 January 2012

Definition

Suppose X is a linearly ordered set (i.e., a set equipped with a total ordering where we denote the strict order by <. Then, the order topology is a topology on X defined in the following equivalent ways.

In terms of subbasis

The order topology can be defined by means of the following subbasis:

  • For aX, sets (a,), defined as sets of the form {xa<x}
  • For aX, sets (,a), defined as sets of the form {xx<a}

In terms of basis

The order topology can be defined by means of the following basis:

  • For aX, sets (a,), defined as sets of the form {xa<x}
  • For aX, sets (,a), defined as sets of the form {xx<a}
  • For a,bX with a<b, sets (a,b), defined as sets of the form {xa<x<b}

Type of resultant topological space

We use the term linearly orderable space for a topological space that arises by taking the order topology on a linearly ordered set.