Contractible space: Difference between revisions
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
=== | === Equivalent definitions in tabular format === | ||
A [[topological space]] is said to be '''contractible''' if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions | A nonempty [[topological space]] is said to be '''contractible''' if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions. The [[empty space]] is generally excluded from consideration when considering the question of contractibility. | ||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! No. !! Shorthand !! A topological space is termed contractible if ... !! A topological space <math>X</math> is termed contractible if ... | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || homotopy-equivalent to a point || there is a [[homotopy equivalence of topological spaces]] between the topological space and a [[one-point space]]. || There exist [[continuous map]]s <math>f: X \to \{ * \}</math> and <math>g: \{ * \} \to X</math> such that <math>f \circ g</math> is homotopic to the identity map on <math>\{ * \}</math> and <math>g \circ f</math> is homotopic to the identity map on <math>X</math>. Here, <math>\{ * \}</math> is a one-point space. Also, note that the condition on <math>f \circ g</math> is tautological, and the map <math>f</math> is already uniquely determined, so all the action occurs in the definition of <math>g</math> and the homotopy between <math>g \circ f</math> and the identity map on <math>X</math>. | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || homotopy-equivalent to a point (arbitrary map) || ''any'' pair of maps between the space and a one-point space define a homotopy equivalence of topological spaces. || For ''any'' continuous map <math>f: X \to \{ * \}</math> and <math>g: \{ * \} \to X</math>, <math>f \circ g</math> is homotopic to the identity map on <math>\{ * \}</math> and <math>g \circ f</math> is homotopic to the identity map on <math>X</math>. Here, <math>\{ * \}</math> is a one-point space. Also, note that the condition on <math>f \circ g</math> is tautological, and the map <math>f</math> is already uniquely determined, so all the action occurs in the definition of <math>g</math> and the homotopy between <math>g \circ f</math> and the identity map on <math>X</math>. | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || admits a contracting homotopy || there is a point in the space to which there is a [[contracting homotopy]]. || there exists a point <math>x_0 \in X</math> and a contracting homotopy that contracts <math>X</math> to <math>x_0</math>. Explicitly, there exists a continuous map <math>F: X \times [0,1] \to X</math> such that <math>F(x,0) = x</math> for all <math>x</math>, and <math>F(x,1) = x_0</math> for all <math>x</math>. Note that we do ''not'' assume or require that <math>F(x_0,a) = x_0</math> for all <math>a \in [0,1]</math>. | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || admits a contracting homotopy (arbitrary point) || the space admits a [[contracting homotopy]] to ''any'' point in it. || for ''any'' point <math>x_1 \in X</math>, there is a contracting homotopy that contracts <math>X</math> to <math>x_1</math>. | |||
|} | |||
==Metaproperties== | ==Metaproperties== |
Revision as of 15:20, 31 May 2016
This article defines a homotopy-invariant property of topological spaces, i.e. a property of homotopy classes of topological spaces
View other homotopy-invariant properties of topological spaces OR view all properties of topological spaces
Definition
Equivalent definitions in tabular format
A nonempty topological space is said to be contractible if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions. The empty space is generally excluded from consideration when considering the question of contractibility.
No. | Shorthand | A topological space is termed contractible if ... | A topological space is termed contractible if ... |
---|---|---|---|
1 | homotopy-equivalent to a point | there is a homotopy equivalence of topological spaces between the topological space and a one-point space. | There exist continuous maps and such that is homotopic to the identity map on and is homotopic to the identity map on . Here, is a one-point space. Also, note that the condition on is tautological, and the map is already uniquely determined, so all the action occurs in the definition of and the homotopy between and the identity map on . |
2 | homotopy-equivalent to a point (arbitrary map) | any pair of maps between the space and a one-point space define a homotopy equivalence of topological spaces. | For any continuous map and , is homotopic to the identity map on and is homotopic to the identity map on . Here, is a one-point space. Also, note that the condition on is tautological, and the map is already uniquely determined, so all the action occurs in the definition of and the homotopy between and the identity map on . |
3 | admits a contracting homotopy | there is a point in the space to which there is a contracting homotopy. | there exists a point and a contracting homotopy that contracts to . Explicitly, there exists a continuous map such that for all , and for all . Note that we do not assume or require that for all . |
4 | admits a contracting homotopy (arbitrary point) | the space admits a contracting homotopy to any point in it. | for any point , there is a contracting homotopy that contracts to . |
Metaproperties
Metaproperty name | Satisfied? | Proof | Statement with symbols |
---|---|---|---|
product-closed property of topological spaces | Yes | contractibility is product-closed | If form a (finite or infinite) collection of contractible spaces, then the product of the s, equipped with the product topology, is also contractible. In particular, if are contractible, then is also contractible. |
retract-hereditary property of topological spaces | Yes | contractibility is retract-hereditary | If and is a continuous retraction, and is contractible, then is contractible. |
suspension-closed property of topological spaces | Yes | contractibility is suspension-closed | The suspension of a contractible space is contractible. |
closure-preserved property of topological spaces | No | contractibility is not closure-preserved | It is possible to have a topological space and a subset of such that is contractible in the subspace topology, but the closure is not. |
interior-preserved property of topological spaces | No | contractibility is not interior-preserved | It is possible to have a topological space and a subset of such that is contractible in the subspace topology, but the interior of is not. |
intersection-closed property of topological spaces | No | contractibility is not intersection-closed | It is possible to have a topological space and subsets of such that are both contractible in their respective subspace topology but is not. |
connected union-closed property of topological spaces | No | contractibility is not connected union-closed | It is possible to have a topological space expressible as a union of subsets , both contractible in their subspace topology, with nonempty, but itself not contractible. |
Relation with other properties
Stronger properties
Property | Meaning | Proof of implication | Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) | Intermediate notions |
---|---|---|---|---|
cone space over some topological space | cone space implies contractible | |||
topologically star-like space | |FULL LIST, MORE INFO | |||
topologically convex space | homeomorphic to a convex subset of Euclidean space | via star-like | Equiconnected space, Space in which every retraction is a deformation retraction, Topologically star-like space|FULL LIST, MORE INFO | |
suddenly contractible space | has a contracting homotopy that is also a sudden homotopy | |FULL LIST, MORE INFO | ||
SDR-contractible space | has a contracting homotopy that is also a deformation retraction | |FULL LIST, MORE INFO |
Weaker properties
References
Textbook references
- Topology (2nd edition) by James R. MunkresMore info, Page 330, Exercise 3 (definition introduced in exercise)
- Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. ThorpeMore info, Page 51 (formal definition)
- An Introduction to Algebraic Topology (Graduate Texts in Mathematics) by Joseph J. RotmanMore info, Page 18 (formal definition)
- Algebraic Topology by Allen HatcherFull text PDFMore info, Page 4 (formal definition)
- Algebraic Topology by Edwin H. SpanierMore info, Page 25 (definition in paragraph)