Compact times paracompact implies paracompact: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
==Facts used==
==Facts used==


# [[uses::Tube lemma]]: If <math>X</math> is a compact space and <math>Y</math> is a topological space. Then, given any open subset <math>U</math> of <math>X \times Y</math> containing <math>X \times \{ y \}</math> for some <math>y \in Y</math>, there exists an open subset <math>V</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>y \in V</math> and <math>X \times V \subseteq U</math>.
# [[uses::Tube lemma]]: Suppose <math>X</math> is a compact space and <math>Y</math> is a topological space. Then, given any open subset <math>U</math> of <math>X \times Y</math> containing <math>X \times \{ y \}</math> for some <math>y \in Y</math>, there exists an open subset <math>V</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>y \in V</math> and <math>X \times V \subseteq U</math>.


==Proof==
==Proof==


'''Given''': A compact space <math>X</math>, a paracompact space <math>Y</math>.
'''Given''': A compact space <math>X</math>, a paracompact space <math>Y</math>. <math>\{ U_i \}_{i \in I}</math> form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math>.


'''To prove''' If <math>U_i</math> form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math>, there exists a locally finite open refinement of the <math>U_i</math>.
'''To prove''': There exists a locally finite open refinement of the <math>U_i</math>s, i.e., an open cover <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math> of <math>X \times Y</math> such that:
* It is locally finite: or any point <math>(x,y) \in X \times Y</math>, there exists an open set <math>R</math> containing <math>(x,y)</math> that intersects only finitely many of the <math>Q_k</math>s.
* It refines <math>\{ U_i \}_{i \in I}</math>: Every <math>Q_k</math> is contained in one of the <math>U_i</math>s.


'''Proof''':
'''Proof''':


# For any point <math>y \in Y</math>, there is a finite collection of <math>U_i</math> that cover <math>X \times \{ y \}</math>: Since <math>X</math> is compact, the subspace <math>X \times \{ y \}</math> of <math>X \times Y</math> is also compact, so the cover by the open subsets <math>U_i</math> has a finite subcover.
{| class="sortable" border="1"
# Let <math>W_y</math> be the union of this finite collection of open subsets <math>U_i</math>. By fact (1), there exists an open subset <math>V_y</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>X \times V_y \subseteq W_y</math>.
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
# The <math>V_y</math> form an open cover of <math>Y</math>.
|-
# There exists a locally finite open refinement, say <math>\mathcal{P}</math> of the <math>V_y</math> in <math>Y</math>: This follows from the fact that <math>Y</math> is paracompact.
| 1 || For any point <math>y \in Y</math>, there is a finite collection of <math>U_i</math> that cover <math>X \times \{ y \}</math> || ||  <math>X</math> is compact || || Since <math>X</math> is compact, the subspace <math>X \times \{ y \}</math> of <math>X \times Y</math> is also compact, so the cover by the open subsets <math>U_i</math> has a finite subcover.
# We can construct a locally finite open refinement of <math>U_i</math> from these:
|-
## For each member <math>P \in \mathcal{P}</math>, there exists <math>V_y</math> such that <math>P \subseteq V_y</math>. Thus, <math>X \times P \subseteq X \times V_y \subseteq W_y</math>. <math>W_y</math>, in turn, is a union of a finite collection of <math>U_i</math>s. Thus, <math>X \times P</math> is the union of the intersections <math>(X \times P) \cap U_i</math>.  
| 2 || For any point <math>y \in Y</math>, let <math>W_y</math> be the union of this finite collection of open subsets <math>U_i</math> as obtained in Step (1). There exists an open subset <math>V_y</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>y \in V_y</math> and <math>X \times V_y \subseteq W_y</math> || Fact (1) || <math>X</math> is compact || Step (1) || Follows from Fact (1), setting the <math>U</math> of Fact (1) to be <math>W_y</math>.
## Since the <math>X \times P</math> together cover <math>X \times Y</math>, the <math>(X \times P) \cap U_i</math> are an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math> that refines the <math>U_i</math>s.
|-
## Finally, we argue that <math>(X \times P) \cap U_i</math> is a ''locally finite'' open cover: Suppose <math>(x,y) \in X \times Y</math>. Since <math>\mathcal{P}</math> is a locally finite open cover of <math>Y</math>, there exists an open subset <math>Q</math> of <math>Y</math> containing <math>y</math> such that <math>Q</math> intersects only finitely many members of <math>\mathcal{P}</math>. Thus, the neighborhood <math>X \times Q</math> intersects only finitely many <math>X \times P</math>s, which in turn give rise to finitely many <math>(X \times P) \cap U_i</math>s each. Thus, <math>X \times Q</math> intersects only finitely many members of the open cover.
| 3 || The open subsets <math>V_y, y \in Y</math> obtained in Step (2) form an open cover of <math>Y</math>. || || || Step (2) || By Step (2), <math>y \in V_y</math>, hence <math>X \times \{ y \} \subseteq X \times V_y</math>. Since <math>\bigcup_{y \in Y} \{ y \} = Y</math>, and <math>y \in V_y \subseteq Y</math>, we get <math>\bigcup_{y \in Y} V_y = Y</math>.
|-
| 4 || There exists a locally finite open refinement <math>\{ P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> of the <math>V_y</math> in <math>Y</math> || || <math>Y</math> is paracompact || Step (3) || Step-given combination direct.
|-
| 5 || For each <math>P_j</math>, <math>X \times P_j</math> is a union of finitely many intersections <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>, all of which are open subsets || || || Steps (1) (2), (4) || Since <math>P_j</math>s refine <math>V_y</math>s (Step (4)), there exists <math>y \in Y</math> such that <math>P_j \subseteq V_y</math>. In turn, by the definition of <math>V_y</math> (Step (2)), we have <math>X \times V_y \subseteq W_y</math>, which in turn is a union of finitely many <math>U_i</math>s (Step (1)). Thus, <math>X \times P_j</math> is contained in a union of finitely many <math>U_i</math>s, and hence, is the union of its intersection with those <math>U_i</math>s. Since <math>U_i</math> are all open, the intersections <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math> are all open.
|-
| 6 || The open subsets of the form <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math> of Step (5) form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math> that refines the <math>U_i</math>s (note that not every combination of <math>P_j</math> and <math>U_i</math> is included -- only the finitely many <math>U_i</math>s needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set <math>K subseteq I \times J</math>, and call it <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math>, where <math>Q_k = (X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>. In particular, if <math>k = (i,j)</math>, then <math>Q_k \subseteq P_j</math>, and for any <math>j<math>, there are finitely many <math>k \in K</math> with <math>k = (i,j)</math>. || || || Steps (4), (5) || <math>\{ P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> cover <math>Y</math>, so <math>\{ X \times P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> cover <math>X \times Y</math>. By Step (5), <math>X \times P_j</math> is the union of the <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>, so the latter also form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math>.
|-
| 7 || The open cover <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math> of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any <math>(x, y) \in X \times Y</math>, there is an open subset <math>R \ni (x,y)</math> such that <math>R</math> intersects only finite many <math>Q_k</math>s. || || || Steps (4), (6) || Since <math>\{ P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> form a locally finite open cover of <math>Y</math> (Step (4)), there exists an open subset <math>S</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>S</math> contains <math>y</math> and <math>S</math> intersects only finitely many of the <math>P_j</math>s. Set <math>R  = X \times S</math>, so <math>R</math> is open in <math>X \times Y</math>. <math>R</math> therefore intersects only finitely many of the <math>X \times P_j</math>s. For any <math>Q_k</math>, with <math>k = (i,j)</math>, we have <math>Q_k \subseteq P_j</math> by construction (Step (6)), so if <math>Q_k</math> intersects <math>R</math> so does <math>X \times P_j</math>. Thus, the <math>Q_k</math>s that intersect <math>R</math> must correspond to the finitely many <math>j</math>s for which <math>R</math> intersects <math>X \times P_j</math>. Since there are finitely many <math>k</math>s for each <math>j</math>, this gives that there are finitely many <math>Q_k</math>s intersecting <math>R</math>.
|}

Revision as of 16:25, 3 June 2017

This article states and proves a result of the following form: the product of two topological spaces, the first satisfying the property Compact space (?) and the second satisfying the property Paracompact space (?), is a topological space satisfying the property Paracompact space (?).
View other such computations

Statement

Verbal statement

The product of a compact space with a paracompact space (given the product topology), is paracompact

Statement with symbols

Let be a compact space and a paracompact space. Then is paracompact.

Related facts

Other results using the same proof technique:

Facts used

  1. Tube lemma: Suppose is a compact space and is a topological space. Then, given any open subset of containing for some , there exists an open subset of such that and .

Proof

Given: A compact space , a paracompact space . form an open cover of .

To prove: There exists a locally finite open refinement of the s, i.e., an open cover of such that:

  • It is locally finite: or any point , there exists an open set containing that intersects only finitely many of the s.
  • It refines : Every is contained in one of the s.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For any point , there is a finite collection of that cover is compact Since is compact, the subspace of is also compact, so the cover by the open subsets has a finite subcover.
2 For any point , let be the union of this finite collection of open subsets as obtained in Step (1). There exists an open subset of such that and Fact (1) is compact Step (1) Follows from Fact (1), setting the of Fact (1) to be .
3 The open subsets obtained in Step (2) form an open cover of . Step (2) By Step (2), , hence . Since , and , we get .
4 There exists a locally finite open refinement of the in is paracompact Step (3) Step-given combination direct.
5 For each , is a union of finitely many intersections , all of which are open subsets Steps (1) (2), (4) Since s refine s (Step (4)), there exists such that . In turn, by the definition of (Step (2)), we have , which in turn is a union of finitely many s (Step (1)). Thus, is contained in a union of finitely many s, and hence, is the union of its intersection with those s. Since are all open, the intersections are all open.
6 The open subsets of the form of Step (5) form an open cover of that refines the s (note that not every combination of and is included -- only the finitely many s needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set , and call it , where . In particular, if , then , and for any with . Steps (4), (5) cover , so cover . By Step (5), is the union of the , so the latter also form an open cover of .
7 The open cover of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any , there is an open subset such that intersects only finite many s. Steps (4), (6) Since form a locally finite open cover of (Step (4)), there exists an open subset of such that contains and intersects only finitely many of the s. Set , so is open in . therefore intersects only finitely many of the s. For any , with , we have by construction (Step (6)), so if intersects so does . Thus, the s that intersect must correspond to the finitely many s for which intersects . Since there are finitely many s for each , this gives that there are finitely many s intersecting .