Tietze extension theorem: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
 
Line 29: Line 29:
| 1 || Let <math>\! C_1 = f^{-1}([-1,-1/3])</math> and <math>\! D_1 = f^{-1}([1/3,1])</math> || Existence of <math>f:A \to [0,1]</math> || -- || -- ||
| 1 || Let <math>\! C_1 = f^{-1}([-1,-1/3])</math> and <math>\! D_1 = f^{-1}([1/3,1])</math> || Existence of <math>f:A \to [0,1]</math> || -- || -- ||
|-
|-
| 2 || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>A</math>. || <math>f</math> is continuous || (1) || inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under <math>f</math> are disjoint.
| 2 || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>A</math>. || <math>f</math> is continuous || Step (1) || inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under <math>f</math> are disjoint.
|-
|-
| 3 || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>X</math>. || <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || (2) || (2) || By step (2), <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed in <math>A</math>, which is closed in <math>X</math>. Thus, <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed in <math>X</math>.
| 3 || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>X</math>. || <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Step (2) || Fact (2) || By step (2), <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed in <math>A</math>, which is closed in <math>X</math>. Thus, <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed in <math>X</math>.
|-
|-
| 4 || Construct a continuous function <math>\! g_1: X \to [-1/3,1/3]</math> such that <math>\! g_1(C_1) = -1/3</math> and <math>\! g_1(D_1) = 1/3</math>. || || (3) || (1) ([[Urysohn's lemma]]) || Urysohn's lemma guarantees a continuous function <math>h:X \to [0,1]</math> such that <math>h(C_1) = 0</math> and <math>h(D_1) = 1</math>. Define <math>g_1(x) := (2h(x) - 1)/3</math>.
| 4 || Construct a continuous function <math>\! g_1: X \to [-1/3,1/3]</math> such that <math>\! g_1(C_1) = -1/3</math> and <math>\! g_1(D_1) = 1/3</math>. || || Step (3) || Fact (1) ([[Urysohn's lemma]]) || Urysohn's lemma guarantees a continuous function <math>h:X \to [0,1]</math> such that <math>h(C_1) = 0</math> and <math>h(D_1) = 1</math>. Define <math>g_1(x) := (2h(x) - 1)/3</math>.
|-
|-
| 5 || Define <math>\! f_1 = f_0 - g_1</math> as a function on <math>A</math>. Note that <math>\! f_1</math> is a continuous function on <math>\! A</math> taking values in <math>\! [-2/3,2/3]</math>. || (<math>f = f_0</math> is continuous) || (4) || sum or difference of continuous functions on subsets of a topological space is continuous on their intersection. || <math>f_1</math> is continuous since both <math>f_0</math> and <math>g_1</math> are continuous. For the range, note the following. For <math>x \in A</math>, there are three possibilities for the interval in which <math>f_0(x)</math> lies: <math>[-1,-1/3]</math>, <math>[-1/3,1/3]</math>, and <math>[1/3,1]</math>. In the first case, <math>g_1(x) = -1/3</math>, so <math>f_0(x) - g_1(x</math> is in <math>[-1 - (-1/3), -1/3 - (-1/3)] = [-2/3,0]</math>. In the second case, both <math>f_0(x)</math> and <math>g_1(x)</math> are in <math>[-1/3,1/3]</math>, so by the triangle inequality, the difference is in <math>[-2/3,2/3]</math>. In the third case, <math>g_1(x) = 1/3</math> so <math>f_0(x) - g_1(x)</math> is in <math>[1/3 - 1/3,1 - 1/3] = [0,2/3]</math>.
| 5 || Define <math>\! f_1 = f_0 - g_1</math> as a function on <math>A</math>. Note that <math>\! f_1</math> is a continuous function on <math>\! A</math> taking values in <math>\! [-2/3,2/3]</math>. || (<math>f = f_0</math> is continuous) || Step (4) || sum or difference of continuous functions on subsets of a topological space is continuous on their intersection. || <math>f_1</math> is continuous since both <math>f_0</math> and <math>g_1</math> are continuous. For the range, note the following. For <math>x \in A</math>, there are three possibilities for the interval in which <math>f_0(x)</math> lies: <math>[-1,-1/3]</math>, <math>[-1/3,1/3]</math>, and <math>[1/3,1]</math>. In the first case, <math>g_1(x) = -1/3</math>, so <math>f_0(x) - g_1(x</math> is in <math>[-1 - (-1/3), -1/3 - (-1/3)] = [-2/3,0]</math>. In the second case, both <math>f_0(x)</math> and <math>g_1(x)</math> are in <math>[-1/3,1/3]</math>, so by the triangle inequality, the difference is in <math>[-2/3,2/3]</math>. In the third case, <math>g_1(x) = 1/3</math> so <math>f_0(x) - g_1(x)</math> is in <math>[1/3 - 1/3,1 - 1/3] = [0,2/3]</math>.
|-
|-
| 6 || We proceed iteratively as follows: from the previous stage, we have a continuous function <math>f_i</math> on the closed subset <math>A</math> taking values in <math>\! [-(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. || || || ||
| 6 || We proceed iteratively as follows: from the previous stage, we have a continuous function <math>f_i</math> on the closed subset <math>A</math> taking values in <math>\! [-(2/3)^i,(2/3)^i]</math>. || || || ||
Line 43: Line 43:
| 8 || <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>A</math>. || || (6): <math>f_i</math> is continuous || inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under <math>f</math> are disjoint.
| 8 || <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>A</math>. || || (6): <math>f_i</math> is continuous || inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed || <math>C_1</math> and <math>D_1</math> are closed subsets of <math>A</math> since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under <math>f</math> are disjoint.
|-
|-
| 9 || <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>X</math>. || <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || (8) || (2) (closed subsets of closed subsets are closed) || By step (8), <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are closed in <math>A</math>, which is closed in <math>X</math>. Thus, <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are closed in <math>X</math>.
| 9 || <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>X</math>. || <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Step (8) || Fact (2) (closed subsets of closed subsets are closed) || By step (8), <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are closed in <math>A</math>, which is closed in <math>X</math>. Thus, <math>C_{i+1}</math> and <math>D_{i+1}</math> are closed in <math>X</math>.
|-
|-
| 10 || Find a continuous function <math>g_{i+1}:X \to [-(1/3)(2/3)^i,(1(3/(2/3)^i]</math> such that <math>\! g_{i+1}(C_{i+1}) = (-1/3)(2/3)^i</math> and <math>\! g_{i+1}(D_{i+1}) = (1/3)(2/3)^i</math>. || || (9) || (1) ([[Urysohn's lemma]]) || We use fact (1) to get a function to <math>[0,1]</math>, then multiply by 2 and subtract 1 to get a function to <math>[-1,1]</math>, then scale it by the factor of <math>(1/3)(2/3)^i</math>.
| 10 || Find a continuous function <math>g_{i+1}:X \to [-(1/3)(2/3)^i,(1(3/(2/3)^i]</math> such that <math>\! g_{i+1}(C_{i+1}) = (-1/3)(2/3)^i</math> and <math>\! g_{i+1}(D_{i+1}) = (1/3)(2/3)^i</math>. || || Step (9) || Factt (1) ([[Urysohn's lemma]]) || We use Fact (1) to get a function to <math>[0,1]</math>, then multiply by 2 and subtract 1 to get a function to <math>[-1,1]</math>, then scale it by the factor of <math>(1/3)(2/3)^i</math>.
|-
|-
| 11 || Define <math>\! f_{i+1} = f_i - g_{i+1}</math>. <math>f_{i+1}</math> is a continuous function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>\! [-(2/3)^{i+1},(2/3)^{i+1}]</math>. || || (6), (10) || || (Same logic as for (5))
| 11 || Define <math>\! f_{i+1} = f_i - g_{i+1}</math>. <math>f_{i+1}</math> is a continuous function on <math>A</math> taking values in <math>\! [-(2/3)^{i+1},(2/3)^{i+1}]</math>. || || Steps (6), (10) || || (Same logic as for (5))
|-
|-
| 12 || Define the following function <math>g:X \to [-1,1]</math>: <math>g = \sum_{i=1}^\infty g_i</math>. This function is well defined. || || (10) || || Note that the absolute value of <math>g_i</math> is bounded by the geometric progression <math>(1/3) + (1/3)(2/3) + (1/3)(2/3)^2 + \dots = 1</math>. Similarly, the lower bound is <math>-1</math>. Further, since <math>g_n</math> are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series <math>g_n</math> converges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in <math>[-1,1]</math>.
| 12 || Define the following function <math>g:X \to [-1,1]</math>: <math>g = \sum_{i=1}^\infty g_i</math>. This function is well defined. || || Step (10) || || Note that the absolute value of <math>g_i</math> is bounded by the geometric progression <math>(1/3) + (1/3)(2/3) + (1/3)(2/3)^2 + \dots = 1</math>. Similarly, the lower bound is <math>-1</math>. Further, since <math>g_n</math> are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series <math>g_n</math> converges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in <math>[-1,1]</math>.
|-
|-
| 13 || The function <math>g</math> is continuous. || || (10) || || This follows from the fact that each <math>g_i</math> is continuous and the co-domain of the <math>g_i</math>s approaches zero. {{fillin}}
| 13 || The function <math>g</math> is continuous. || || Step (10) || || This follows from the fact that each <math>g_i</math> is continuous and the co-domain of the <math>g_i</math>s approaches zero. {{fillin}}
|-
|-
| 14 || <math>\! g|_A = f</math>. || || || || Let <math>x \in A</math>. Then, <math>\! f_1(x) = f(x) - g_1(x)</math>. Inductively, <math>f_n(x) = f(x) - \sum_{i=1}^n g_i(x)</math>. Since the upper and lower bound on <math>f_n</math> tend to zero as <math>n \to \infty</math>, <math>f_n(x) \to 0</math> as <math>n \to \infty</math>. Thus, <math>f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^\infty g_i(x) = g(x)</math> for <math>x \in A</math>.
| 14 || <math>\! g|_A = f</math>. || || || || Let <math>x \in A</math>. Then, <math>\! f_1(x) = f(x) - g_1(x)</math>. Inductively, <math>f_n(x) = f(x) - \sum_{i=1}^n g_i(x)</math>. Since the upper and lower bound on <math>f_n</math> tend to zero as <math>n \to \infty</math>, <math>f_n(x) \to 0</math> as <math>n \to \infty</math>. Thus, <math>f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^\infty g_i(x) = g(x)</math> for <math>x \in A</math>.
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 22:50, 29 April 2022

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in topology.

Statement

Suppose is a normal space (i.e., a topological space that is T1 and where any two disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose is a closed subset of , and is a continuous map. Then, there exists a continuous map such that the restriction of to is .

Facts used

  1. Urysohn's lemma: This states that for, given two closed subsets of a normal space , there is a continuous function such that and .
  2. Closedness is transitive: A closed subset (in the subspace topology) of a closed subset is closed in the whole space.

Proof

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

Note that since is homeomorphic to , it suffices to prove the result replacing with . We will also freely use that any closed interval is homeomorphic to , so Urysohn's lemma can be stated replacing by any closed interval.

Given: A normal space . A closed subset of . A continuous function .

To prove: There exists a continuous function such that the restriction of to is .

Proof: We write .

The key part of the proof is the inductive portions (6)-(10). Steps (1)-(5) can be thought of as a special case of these; however, these steps are provided separately so that the full details can be seen in the base case before the general inductive setup is used.

Step no. Construction/assertion Given data used Previous steps used Facts used Explanation
1 Let and Existence of -- --
2 and are disjoint closed subsets of . is continuous Step (1) inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed and are closed subsets of since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under are disjoint.
3 and are disjoint closed subsets of . is closed in Step (2) Fact (2) By step (2), and are closed in , which is closed in . Thus, and are closed in .
4 Construct a continuous function such that and . Step (3) Fact (1) (Urysohn's lemma) Urysohn's lemma guarantees a continuous function such that and . Define .
5 Define as a function on . Note that is a continuous function on taking values in . ( is continuous) Step (4) sum or difference of continuous functions on subsets of a topological space is continuous on their intersection. is continuous since both and are continuous. For the range, note the following. For , there are three possibilities for the interval in which lies: , , and . In the first case, , so is in . In the second case, both and are in , so by the triangle inequality, the difference is in . In the third case, so is in .
6 We proceed iteratively as follows: from the previous stage, we have a continuous function on the closed subset taking values in .
7 Let and .
8 and are disjoint closed subsets of . (6): is continuous inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed and are closed subsets of since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under are disjoint.
9 and are disjoint closed subsets of . is closed in Step (8) Fact (2) (closed subsets of closed subsets are closed) By step (8), and are closed in , which is closed in . Thus, and are closed in .
10 Find a continuous function such that and . Step (9) Factt (1) (Urysohn's lemma) We use Fact (1) to get a function to , then multiply by 2 and subtract 1 to get a function to , then scale it by the factor of .
11 Define . is a continuous function on taking values in . Steps (6), (10) (Same logic as for (5))
12 Define the following function : . This function is well defined. Step (10) Note that the absolute value of is bounded by the geometric progression . Similarly, the lower bound is . Further, since are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series converges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in .
13 The function is continuous. Step (10) This follows from the fact that each is continuous and the co-domain of the s approaches zero. Fill this in later
14 . Let . Then, . Inductively, . Since the upper and lower bound on tend to zero as , as . Thus, for .