Gluing lemma for closed subsets: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
m (7 revisions)
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:45, 11 May 2008

This article is about the statement of a simple but indispensable lemma in topology

Statement

Let A and B be closed subsets of a topological space X whose union is X, and f:AY and g:BY be continuous maps such that f(x)=g(x)xAB. Then there exists a unique continuous map from X to Y whose restriction to A is f and to B is g.

The result can be modified to handle finitely many closed sets which cover X; however, it does not cater to arbitrarily many closed sets which cover X. This is in contrast with the gluing lemma for open subsets.

Related results

Proof

The proof uses the following key facts:

  • A map is continuous if and only if the inverse image of any closed subset is closed
  • A closed subset of a closed subset is closed. For full proof, refer: Closedness is transitive
  • A union of two closed subsets is closed

Fill this in later

Applications

The gluing lemma for closed subsets is one of the many results in point-set topology which is applied everywhere, often without even consciously realizing it. Here are some examples:

  • The multiplication defined in the fundamental group and higher homotopy grooups, uses the gluing lemma (to argue that a composite of loops is a loop)
  • The fact that homotopies can be composed also uses the gluing lemma
  • Many of the proofs involving manifolds, for instance, the proof that the inclusion of a point in a manifold is a cofibration, or the proof that connected manifolds are homogeneous, uses the gluing lemma; we glue an explicit map in a neighbourhood of the point with a constant map outside.