Homotopy of maps induces chain homotopy: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Construction== | ==Construction== | ||
To construct a chain homotopy, we need a homomorphism from the set of the group of <math>q</math>-[[singular chain]]s of <math>X</math> to the group of <math>(q | To construct a chain homotopy, we need a homomorphism from the set of the group of <math>q</math>-[[singular chain]]s of <math>X</math> to the group of <math>(q+1)</math>-singular chains of <math>Y</math>. To define such a homomorphism, we need to define it only on singular simplices (since it'll extend uniquely by linearity). | ||
Here's how we do this. Given a singular <math>q</math>-simplex <math>\sigma</math>, compose <math>\sigma</math> with the following map{{fillin}} | Here's how we do this. Given a singular <math>q</math>-simplex <math>\sigma</math>, compose <math>\sigma</math> with the following map{{fillin}} | ||
Revision as of 23:36, 30 September 2007
Statement
Let be a homotopy between . In other words and for all . Then, there is a chain homotopy from the singular complex of to the singular complex of such that . In fact, the map sending to is a homomorphism in the sense that if is the composite of and , .
Construction
To construct a chain homotopy, we need a homomorphism from the set of the group of -singular chains of to the group of -singular chains of . To define such a homomorphism, we need to define it only on singular simplices (since it'll extend uniquely by linearity).
Here's how we do this. Given a singular -simplex , compose with the following mapFill this in later