Compact times paracompact implies paracompact

From Topospaces
Revision as of 16:32, 3 June 2017 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (→‎Proof)

This article states and proves a result of the following form: the product of two topological spaces, the first satisfying the property Compact space (?) and the second satisfying the property Paracompact space (?), is a topological space satisfying the property Paracompact space (?).
View other such computations

Statement

Let X be a compact space and Y a paracompact space. Then X×Y, the Cartesian product endowed with the product topology, is paracompact.

Related facts

Other results using the same proof technique:

Facts used

  1. Tube lemma: Suppose X is a compact space and Y is a topological space. Then, given any open subset U of X×Y containing X×{y} for some yY, there exists an open subset V of Y such that yV and X×VU.

Proof

Given: A compact space X, a paracompact space Y. {Ui}iI form an open cover of X×Y.

To prove: There exists a locally finite open refinement of the Uis, i.e., an open cover {Qk}kK of X×Y such that:

  • It is locally finite: For any point (x,y)X×Y, there exists an open set R containing (x,y) that intersects only finitely many of the Qks.
  • It refines {Ui}iI: Every Qk is contained in one of the Uis.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For any point yY, there is a finite collection of Ui that cover X×{y} X is compact Since X is compact, the subspace X×{y} of X×Y is also compact, so the cover by the open subsets Ui has a finite subcover.
2 For any point yY, let Wy be the union of this finite collection of open subsets Ui as obtained in Step (1). There exists an open subset Vy of Y such that yVy and X×VyWy Fact (1) X is compact Step (1) Follows from Fact (1), setting the U of Fact (1) to be Wy.
3 The open subsets Vy,yY obtained in Step (2) form an open cover of Y. Step (2) By Step (2), yVy, hence X×{y}X×Vy. Since yY{y}=Y, and yVyY, we get yYVy=Y.
4 There exists a locally finite open refinement {Pj}jJ of the Vy in Y Y is paracompact Step (3) Step-given combination direct.
5 For each Pj, X×Pj is a union of finitely many intersections (X×Pj)Ui, all of which are open subsets Steps (1) (2), (4) Since Pjs refine Vys (Step (4)), there exists yY such that PjVy. In turn, by the definition of Vy (Step (2)), we have X×VyWy, which in turn is a union of finitely many Uis (Step (1)). Thus, X×Pj is contained in a union of finitely many Uis, and hence, is the union of its intersection with those Uis. Since Ui are all open, the intersections (X×Pj)Ui are all open.
6 The open subsets of the form (X×Pj)Ui of Step (5) form an open cover of X×Y that refines the Uis (note that not every combination of Pj and Ui is included -- only the finitely many Uis needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set KI×J, and call it {Qk}kK, where Qk=(X×Pj)Ui. In particular, if k=(i,j), then QkX×Pj and QkUi, and for any j, there are finitely many kK with the second coordinate of k equal to j. Steps (4), (5) {Pj}jJ cover Y, so {X×Pj}jJ cover X×Y. By Step (5), X×Pj is the union of finitely many (X×Pj)Ui, so the latter also form an open cover of X×Y.
7 The open cover {Qk}kK of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any (x,y)X×Y, there is an open subset R(x,y) such that R intersects only finite many Qks. Steps (4), (6) Since {Pj}jJ form a locally finite open cover of Y (Step (4)), there exists an open subset S of Y such that S contains y and S intersects only finitely many of the Pjs. Set R=X×S, so R is open in X×Y. R therefore intersects only finitely many of the X×Pjs. For any Qk, with k=(i,j), we have QkX×Pj by construction (Step (6)), so if Qk intersects R so does X×Pj. Thus, the Qks that intersect R must correspond to the finitely many js for which R intersects X×Pj. Since there are finitely many ks for each j, this gives that there are finitely many Qks intersecting R.
8 The open cover {Qk}kK is as desired Steps (6), (7) Combine the two steps to get what we wanted to prove.