Paracompactness is weakly hereditary

From Topospaces
Revision as of 02:13, 17 July 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{topospace metaproperty satisfaction| property = paracompact space| metaproperty = weakly hereditary property of topological spaces}} ==Statement== ===Property-theoretic state…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., paracompact space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., weakly hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about paracompact space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of paracompact space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of paracompact space|Get more facts about weakly hereditary property of topological spaces

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of being a paracompact space is a weakly hereditary property of topological spaces.

Verbal statement

Any closed subset of a paracompact space is a paracompact space with the subspace topology.

Related facts

Proof

Given: A paracompact space , a closed subset of .

To prove: Consider an open cover of by open sets with , an indexing set. The have a locally finite open refinement.

Proof:

  1. By the definition of subspace topology, we can find open sets of such that , thus the union of the s contains .
  2. Since is closed, we can throw in the open set , and get an open cover of the whole space .
  3. Since the whole space is compact, this open cover has a locally finite open refinement. In other words, there is a locally finite open refinement of the s, that, possibly along with , covers the whole of .
  4. By throwing out any member of this new refinement that do not intersect , we get a locally finite open refinement of s whose union contains . The intersections of these with form a locally finite open refinement of the s: The main point here is that if an open set in the refinement is contained in , its intersection with is contained in .