T1 not implies Hausdorff

From Topospaces
Revision as of 18:39, 26 October 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{topospace property non-implication| stronger = T1 space| weaker = Hausdorff space}} ==Statement== A T1 space need not be a Hausdorff space. ==Proof== ===Example of …')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., T1 space (?)) need not satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., Hausdorff space (?))
View a complete list of topological space property non-implications | View a complete list of topological space property implications |Get help on looking up topological space property implications/non-implications
Get more facts about T1 space|Get more facts about Hausdorff space

Statement

A T1 space need not be a Hausdorff space.

Proof

Example of the cofinite topology

Consider a countable set, say the set of natural numbers, equipped with the cofinite topology. In the cofinite topology, the nonempty open subsets are precisely the cofinite subsets -- the subsets whose complement is finite. With this topology:

  • The space is : Every point is closed, because its complement is an open subset. Equivalently, if are two natural numbers, the complement of is an open subset containing but not .
  • The space is not Hausdorff: it is not possible to separate two points with disjoint open subsets, because any two nonempty open subsets have an infinite intersection. This is because the union of their complements is a union of two finite subsets, and hence is not the whole space.