Compact times paracompact implies paracompact

From Topospaces
Revision as of 16:36, 3 June 2017 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (→‎Proof)

This article states and proves a result of the following form: the product of two topological spaces, the first satisfying the property Compact space (?) and the second satisfying the property Paracompact space (?), is a topological space satisfying the property Paracompact space (?).
View other such computations

Statement

Let X be a compact space and Y a paracompact space. Then X×Y, the Cartesian product endowed with the product topology, is paracompact.

Related facts

Other results using the same proof technique:

Facts used

  1. Tube lemma: Suppose X is a compact space and Y is a topological space. Then, given any open subset U of X×Y containing X×{y} for some yY, there exists an open subset V of Y such that yV and X×VU.

Proof

Given: A compact space X, a paracompact space Y. {Ui}iI form an open cover of X×Y.

To prove: There exists a locally finite open refinement of the Uis, i.e., an open cover {Qk}kK of X×Y such that:

  • It is locally finite: For any point (x,y)X×Y, there exists an open set R containing (x,y) that intersects only finitely many of the Qks.
  • It refines {Ui}iI: Every Qk is contained in one of the Uis.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For any point yY, there is a finite collection of Ui that cover X×{y}. X is compact Since X is compact, the subspace X×{y} of X×Y is also compact, so the cover by the open subsets Ui has a finite subcover.
2 For any point yY, let Wy be the union of this finite collection of open subsets Ui as obtained in Step (1). There exists an open subset Vy of Y such that yVy and X×VyWy. Fact (1) X is compact Step (1) Follows from Fact (1), setting the U of Fact (1) to be Wy.
3 The open subsets Vy,yY obtained in Step (2) form an open cover of Y. Step (2) By Step (2), yVy, hence X×{y}X×Vy. Since yY{y}=Y, and yVyY, we get yYVy=Y.
4 There exists a locally finite open refinement {Pj}jJ of the Vy in Y. Y is paracompact Step (3) Step-given combination direct.
5 For each Pj, X×Pj is a union of finitely many intersections (X×Pj)Ui, all of which are open subsets. Steps (1), (2), (4) (refinement aspect) [SHOW MORE]
6 The open subsets of the form (X×Pj)Ui of Step (5) form an open cover of X×Y that refines the Uis (note that not every combination of Pj and Ui is included -- only the finitely many Uis needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set KI×J, and call it {Qk}kK, where Qk=(X×Pj)Ui. In particular, if k=(i,j), then QkX×Pj and QkUi, and for any j, there are finitely many kK with the second coordinate of k equal to j. Steps (4) (cover aspect), (5) {Pj}jJ cover Y, so {X×Pj}jJ cover X×Y. By Step (5), X×Pj is the union of finitely many (X×Pj)Ui, so the latter also form an open cover of X×Y.
7 The open cover {Qk}kK of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any (x,y)X×Y, there is an open subset R(x,y) such that R intersects only finite many Qks. Steps (4) (locally finite aspect), (6) [SHOW MORE]
8 The open cover {Qk}kK is as desired Steps (6), (7) Combine the two steps to get what we wanted to prove.