Tietze extension theorem

From Topospaces
Revision as of 22:43, 29 April 2022 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (→‎Proof)

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in topology.

Statement

Suppose is a normal space (i.e., a topological space that is T1 and where any two disjoint closed subsets can be separated by disjoint open subsets). Suppose is a closed subset of , and is a continuous map. Then, there exists a continuous map such that the restriction of to is .

Facts used

  1. Urysohn's lemma: This states that for, given two closed subsets of a normal space , there is a continuous function such that and .
  2. Closedness is transitive: A closed subset (in the subspace topology) of a closed subset is closed in the whole space.

Proof

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

Note that since is homeomorphic to , it suffices to prove the result replacing with . We will also freely use that any closed interval is homeomorphic to , so Urysohn's lemma can be stated replacing by any closed interval.

Given: A normal space . A closed subset of . A continuous function .

To prove: There exists a continuous function such that the restriction of to is .

Proof: We write .

The key part of the proof is the inductive portions (6)-(10). Steps (1)-(5) can be thought of as a special case of these; however, these steps are provided separately so that the full details can be seen in the base case before the general inductive setup is used.

Step no. Construction/assertion Given data used Previous steps used Facts used Explanation
1 Let and Existence of -- --
2 and are disjoint closed subsets of . is continuous (1) inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed and are closed subsets of since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under are disjoint.
3 and are disjoint closed subsets of . is closed in (2) (2) By step (2), and are closed in , which is closed in . Thus, and are closed in .
4 Construct a continuous function such that and . (3) (1) (Urysohn's lemma) Urysohn's lemma guarantees a continuous function such that and . Define .
5 Define as a function on . Note that is a continuous function on taking values in . ( is continuous) (4) sum or difference of continuous functions on subsets of a topological space is continuous on their intersection. is continuous since both and are continuous. For the range, note the following. For , there are three possibilities for the interval in which lies: , , and . In the first case, , so is in . In the second case, both and are in , so by the triangle inequality, the difference is in . In the third case, so is in .
6 We proceed iteratively as follows: from the previous stage, we have a continuous function on the closed subset taking values in .
7 Let and .
8 and are disjoint closed subsets of . (6): is continuous inverse image of closed subset under continuous map is closed and are closed subsets of since they are both the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. Moreover, they are disjoint since their images under are disjoint.
9 and are disjoint closed subsets of . is closed in (8) (2) (closed subsets of closed subsets are closed) By step (8), and are closed in , which is closed in . Thus, and are closed in .
10 Find a continuous function such that and . (9) (1) (Urysohn's lemma) We use fact (1) to get a function to , then multiply by 2 and subtract 1 to get a function to , then scale it by the factor of .
11 Define . is a continuous function on taking values in . (6), (10) (Same logic as for (5))
12 Define the following function : . This function is well defined. (10) Note that the absolute value of is bounded by the geometric progression . Similarly, the lower bound is . Further, since are bounded by the geometric progression in absolute value, the series converges. So the sum is well-defined and takes values in .
13 The function is continuous. (10) This follows from the fact that each is continuous and the co-domain of the s approaches zero. Fill this in later
14 . Let . Then, . Inductively, . Since the upper and lower bound on tend to zero as , as . Thus, for .