# Difference between revisions of "Compact times paracompact implies paracompact"

From Topospaces

(→Proof) |
(→Proof) |
||

Line 43: | Line 43: | ||

| 5 || For each <math>P_j</math>, <math>X \times P_j</math> is a union of finitely many intersections <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>, all of which are open subsets || || || Steps (1) (2), (4) || Since <math>P_j</math>s refine <math>V_y</math>s (Step (4)), there exists <math>y \in Y</math> such that <math>P_j \subseteq V_y</math>. In turn, by the definition of <math>V_y</math> (Step (2)), we have <math>X \times V_y \subseteq W_y</math>, which in turn is a union of finitely many <math>U_i</math>s (Step (1)). Thus, <math>X \times P_j</math> is contained in a union of finitely many <math>U_i</math>s, and hence, is the union of its intersection with those <math>U_i</math>s. Since <math>U_i</math> are all open, the intersections <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math> are all open. | | 5 || For each <math>P_j</math>, <math>X \times P_j</math> is a union of finitely many intersections <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>, all of which are open subsets || || || Steps (1) (2), (4) || Since <math>P_j</math>s refine <math>V_y</math>s (Step (4)), there exists <math>y \in Y</math> such that <math>P_j \subseteq V_y</math>. In turn, by the definition of <math>V_y</math> (Step (2)), we have <math>X \times V_y \subseteq W_y</math>, which in turn is a union of finitely many <math>U_i</math>s (Step (1)). Thus, <math>X \times P_j</math> is contained in a union of finitely many <math>U_i</math>s, and hence, is the union of its intersection with those <math>U_i</math>s. Since <math>U_i</math> are all open, the intersections <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math> are all open. | ||

|- | |- | ||

− | | 6 || The open subsets of the form <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math> of Step (5) form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math> that refines the <math>U_i</math>s (note that not every combination of <math>P_j</math> and <math>U_i</math> is included -- only the finitely many <math>U_i</math>s needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set <math>K subseteq I \times J</math>, and call it <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math>, where <math>Q_k = (X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>. In particular, if <math>k = (i,j)</math>, then <math>Q_k \subseteq P_j</math>, and for any <math>j</math>, there are finitely many <math>k \in K</math> with <math>k | + | | 6 || The open subsets of the form <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math> of Step (5) form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math> that refines the <math>U_i</math>s (note that not every combination of <math>P_j</math> and <math>U_i</math> is included -- only the finitely many <math>U_i</math>s needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set <math>K subseteq I \times J</math>, and call it <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math>, where <math>Q_k = (X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>. In particular, if <math>k = (i,j)</math>, then <math>Q_k \subseteq P_j</math>, and for any <math>j</math>, there are finitely many <math>k \in K</math> with the second coordinate of <math>k</math> equal to <math>j</math>. || || || Steps (4), (5) || <math>\{ P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> cover <math>Y</math>, so <math>\{ X \times P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> cover <math>X \times Y</math>. By Step (5), <math>X \times P_j</math> is the union of the <math>(X \times P_j) \cap U_i</math>, so the latter also form an open cover of <math>X \times Y</math>. |

|- | |- | ||

| 7 || The open cover <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math> of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any <math>(x, y) \in X \times Y</math>, there is an open subset <math>R \ni (x,y)</math> such that <math>R</math> intersects only finite many <math>Q_k</math>s. || || || Steps (4), (6) || Since <math>\{ P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> form a locally finite open cover of <math>Y</math> (Step (4)), there exists an open subset <math>S</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>S</math> contains <math>y</math> and <math>S</math> intersects only finitely many of the <math>P_j</math>s. Set <math>R = X \times S</math>, so <math>R</math> is open in <math>X \times Y</math>. <math>R</math> therefore intersects only finitely many of the <math>X \times P_j</math>s. For any <math>Q_k</math>, with <math>k = (i,j)</math>, we have <math>Q_k \subseteq P_j</math> by construction (Step (6)), so if <math>Q_k</math> intersects <math>R</math> so does <math>X \times P_j</math>. Thus, the <math>Q_k</math>s that intersect <math>R</math> must correspond to the finitely many <math>j</math>s for which <math>R</math> intersects <math>X \times P_j</math>. Since there are finitely many <math>k</math>s for each <math>j</math>, this gives that there are finitely many <math>Q_k</math>s intersecting <math>R</math>. | | 7 || The open cover <math>\{ Q_k \}_{k \in K}</math> of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any <math>(x, y) \in X \times Y</math>, there is an open subset <math>R \ni (x,y)</math> such that <math>R</math> intersects only finite many <math>Q_k</math>s. || || || Steps (4), (6) || Since <math>\{ P_j \}_{j \in J}</math> form a locally finite open cover of <math>Y</math> (Step (4)), there exists an open subset <math>S</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>S</math> contains <math>y</math> and <math>S</math> intersects only finitely many of the <math>P_j</math>s. Set <math>R = X \times S</math>, so <math>R</math> is open in <math>X \times Y</math>. <math>R</math> therefore intersects only finitely many of the <math>X \times P_j</math>s. For any <math>Q_k</math>, with <math>k = (i,j)</math>, we have <math>Q_k \subseteq P_j</math> by construction (Step (6)), so if <math>Q_k</math> intersects <math>R</math> so does <math>X \times P_j</math>. Thus, the <math>Q_k</math>s that intersect <math>R</math> must correspond to the finitely many <math>j</math>s for which <math>R</math> intersects <math>X \times P_j</math>. Since there are finitely many <math>k</math>s for each <math>j</math>, this gives that there are finitely many <math>Q_k</math>s intersecting <math>R</math>. |

## Revision as of 16:29, 3 June 2017

This article states and proves a result of the following form: the product of two topological spaces, the first satisfying the property Compact space (?) and the second satisfying the property Paracompact space (?), is a topological space satisfying the property Paracompact space (?).

View other such computations

## Contents

## Statement

Let be a compact space and a paracompact space. Then , the Cartesian product endowed with the product topology, is paracompact.

## Related facts

Other results using the same proof technique:

- Compact times metacompact implies metacompact
- Compact times orthocompact implies orthocompact
- Compact times Lindelof implies Lindelof

## Facts used

- Tube lemma: Suppose is a compact space and is a topological space. Then, given any open subset of containing for some , there exists an open subset of such that and .

## Proof

**Given**: A compact space , a paracompact space . form an open cover of .

**To prove**: There exists a locally finite open refinement of the s, i.e., an open cover of such that:

- It is locally finite: For any point , there exists an open set containing that intersects only finitely many of the s.
- It refines : Every is contained in one of the s.

**Proof**:

Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | For any point , there is a finite collection of that cover | is compact | Since is compact, the subspace of is also compact, so the cover by the open subsets has a finite subcover. | ||

2 | For any point , let be the union of this finite collection of open subsets as obtained in Step (1). There exists an open subset of such that and | Fact (1) | is compact | Step (1) | Follows from Fact (1), setting the of Fact (1) to be . |

3 | The open subsets obtained in Step (2) form an open cover of . | Step (2) | By Step (2), , hence . Since , and , we get . | ||

4 | There exists a locally finite open refinement of the in | is paracompact | Step (3) | Step-given combination direct. | |

5 | For each , is a union of finitely many intersections , all of which are open subsets | Steps (1) (2), (4) | Since s refine s (Step (4)), there exists such that . In turn, by the definition of (Step (2)), we have , which in turn is a union of finitely many s (Step (1)). Thus, is contained in a union of finitely many s, and hence, is the union of its intersection with those s. Since are all open, the intersections are all open. | ||

6 | The open subsets of the form of Step (5) form an open cover of that refines the s (note that not every combination of and is included -- only the finitely many s needed as in Step (5)). We will index this open cover by indexing set , and call it , where . In particular, if , then , and for any , there are finitely many with the second coordinate of equal to . | Steps (4), (5) | cover , so cover . By Step (5), is the union of the , so the latter also form an open cover of . | ||

7 | The open cover of Step (6) is a locally finite open cover. In other words, for any , there is an open subset such that intersects only finite many s. | Steps (4), (6) | Since form a locally finite open cover of (Step (4)), there exists an open subset of such that contains and intersects only finitely many of the s. Set , so is open in . therefore intersects only finitely many of the s. For any , with , we have by construction (Step (6)), so if intersects so does . Thus, the s that intersect must correspond to the finitely many s for which intersects . Since there are finitely many s for each , this gives that there are finitely many s intersecting . | ||

8 | The open cover is as desired | Steps (6), (7) | Combine the two steps to get what we wanted to prove. |