Monotone normality is hereditary: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Proof) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Related facts== | ==Related facts== | ||
* [[ | * [[Monotonically normal implies collectionwise normal]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Monotonically normal implies hereditarily collectionwise normal]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Monotonically normal implies hereditarily normal]] | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''To prove''': We can define a monotone normality operator on <math>Y</math> in terms of <math>G</math>. | '''To prove''': We can define a monotone normality operator on <math>Y</math> in terms of <math>G</math>. | ||
'''Proof''': Suppose <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are closed subsets of <math>Y</math>. Then, by the definition of subspace topology, we have that <math>\overline{A} \cap B</math> is empty and <math>A \cap \overline{B}</math> is empty. | '''Proof''': Note that the part about <math>X</math> being <math>T_1</math> implying <math>Y</math> being <math>T_1</math> is immediate. | ||
Suppose <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>Y</math>. Then, by the definition of subspace topology, we have that <math>\overline{A} \cap B</math> is empty and <math>A \cap \overline{B}</math> is empty. | |||
We define the monotone normality operator on <math>Y</math> as follows: | We define the monotone normality operator on <math>Y</math> as follows: | ||
| Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
# <math>G'(A,B)</math> is open in <math>Y</math>: Note first that since <math>X</math> is <math>T_1</math>, the point <math>\{ a \}</math> is closed. Also, <math>\overline{B}</math> is closed, and disjoint from <math>\{ a \}</math>. Thus, <math>G(\{a \},B)</math> is open for each <math>a \in A</math>. Thus, the union of all of these is open in <math>X</math>, and so, by the definition of subspace topology, the intersection with <math>Y</math> is open in <math>Y</math>. | # <math>G'(A,B)</math> is open in <math>Y</math>: Note first that since <math>X</math> is <math>T_1</math>, the point <math>\{ a \}</math> is closed. Also, <math>\overline{B}</math> is closed, and disjoint from <math>\{ a \}</math>. Thus, <math>G(\{a \},B)</math> is open for each <math>a \in A</math>. Thus, the union of all of these is open in <math>X</math>, and so, by the definition of subspace topology, the intersection with <math>Y</math> is open in <math>Y</math>. | ||
# The closure of <math>G'(A,B)</math> in <math>Y</math> is disjoint from <math>B</math>: Consider <math>G(\overline{A},\{b\})</math> for <math>b \in B</math>. This is an open subset of <math>X</math> by definition, and <math>G(\{a \},\overline{B}) \subseteq G(\overline{A},b)</math> for all <math>a \in A, b \in B</math>. Thus, we obtain that <math>G'(A,B) \subseteq \bigcup_{a \in A} G(\{a\},\overline{B}) \subseteq \bigcap_{b \in B} G(\overline{A},\{b \}) \subseteq \bigcap_{b \in B} \overline{G(\overline{A},\{ b \})}</math>. The last set is closed, and does not contain any of the elements <math>b \in B</math>, so is disjoint from <math>B</math>. Thus, <math>G'(A,B)</math> is contained in a closed subset of <math>X</math> that is disjoint from <math>B</math>. Intersecting with <math>Y</math>, we obtain that <math>G'(A,B)</math> is contained in a closed subset of <math>Y</math> that is disjoint from <math>B</math>. Thus, the closure of <math>G'(A,B)</math> in <math>Y</math> is disjoint from <math>B</math>. | # The closure of <math>G'(A,B)</math> in <math>Y</math> is disjoint from <math>B</math>: Consider <math>G(\overline{A},\{b\})</math> for <math>b \in B</math>. This is an open subset of <math>X</math> by definition, and <math>G(\{a \},\overline{B}) \subseteq G(\overline{A},b)</math> for all <math>a \in A, b \in B</math>. Thus, we obtain that <math>G'(A,B) \subseteq \bigcup_{a \in A} G(\{a\},\overline{B}) \subseteq \bigcap_{b \in B} G(\overline{A},\{b \}) \subseteq \bigcap_{b \in B} \overline{G(\overline{A},\{ b \})}</math>. The last set is closed, and does not contain any of the elements <math>b \in B</math>, so is disjoint from <math>B</math>. Thus, <math>G'(A,B)</math> is contained in a closed subset of <math>X</math> that is disjoint from <math>B</math>. Intersecting with <math>Y</math>, we obtain that <math>G'(A,B)</math> is contained in a closed subset of <math>Y</math> that is disjoint from <math>B</math>. Thus, the closure of <math>G'(A,B)</math> in <math>Y</math> is disjoint from <math>B</math>. | ||
# If <math>A \subseteq A'</math> and <math>B' \subseteq B</math>, with <math>A,B,A',B'</math> all closed in <math>Y</math>, <math>A \cap B = A' \cap B' = \emptyset</math>, then <math>G(A,B) \subseteq G(A',B')</math>: Since <math>B' \subseteq B</math>, we have <math>\overline{B'} \subseteq \overline{B}</math>, so <math>G(\{a \}, overline{B}) \subseteq G(\{a\}, \overline{B'})</math> for all <math>a \in A</math>. Thus, <math>G(A,B) \subseteq G(A,B')</math>. In turn, it is clear that <math>G(A,B') \subseteq G(A',B')</math>. Thus, <math>G(A,B) \subseteq G(A',B')</math>. | # If <math>A \subseteq A'</math> and <math>B' \subseteq B</math>, with <math>A,B,A',B'</math> all closed in <math>Y</math>, <math>A \cap B = A' \cap B' = \emptyset</math>, then <math>G(A,B) \subseteq G(A',B')</math>: Since <math>B' \subseteq B</math>, we have <math>\overline{B'} \subseteq \overline{B}</math>, so <math>G(\{a \}, \overline{B}) \subseteq G(\{a\}, \overline{B'})</math> for all <math>a \in A</math>. Thus, <math>G(A,B) \subseteq G(A,B')</math>. In turn, it is clear that <math>G(A,B') \subseteq G(A',B')</math>. Thus, <math>G(A,B) \subseteq G(A',B')</math>. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:21, 25 January 2012
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., monotonically normal space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about monotonically normal space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of monotonically normal space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of monotonically normal space|Get more facts about subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces
Statement
Suppose is a monotonically normal space with a monotone normality operator . Suppose is a subspace of . Then, is also a monotonically normal space, with a monotone normality operator defined in terms of .
Related facts
- Monotonically normal implies collectionwise normal
- Monotonically normal implies hereditarily collectionwise normal
- Monotonically normal implies hereditarily normal
Proof
Given: A monotonically normal space with monotone normality operator . A subspace of .
To prove: We can define a monotone normality operator on in terms of .
Proof: Note that the part about being implying being is immediate.
Suppose and are disjoint closed subsets of . Then, by the definition of subspace topology, we have that is empty and is empty.
We define the monotone normality operator on as follows:
.
We claim the following:
- is open in : Note first that since is , the point is closed. Also, is closed, and disjoint from . Thus, is open for each . Thus, the union of all of these is open in , and so, by the definition of subspace topology, the intersection with is open in .
- The closure of in is disjoint from : Consider for . This is an open subset of by definition, and for all . Thus, we obtain that . The last set is closed, and does not contain any of the elements , so is disjoint from . Thus, is contained in a closed subset of that is disjoint from . Intersecting with , we obtain that is contained in a closed subset of that is disjoint from . Thus, the closure of in is disjoint from .
- If and , with all closed in , , then : Since , we have , so for all . Thus, . In turn, it is clear that . Thus, .