Compact Hausdorff implies normal: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
stronger = compact Hausdorff space|
stronger = compact Hausdorff space|
weaker = normal space}}
weaker = normal space}}
 
[[Difficulty level::2| ]]
==Statement==
==Statement==
===Property-theoretic statement===
The [[property of topological spaces]] of being [[compact Hausdorff space|compact Hausdorff]] implies, or is stronger than, the property of being [[normal space|normal]].
===Verbal statement===


Any [[compact Hausdorff space]] (a [[topological space]] that is both a [[compact space|compact]] and [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]) is [[normal space|normal]].
Any [[compact Hausdorff space]] (a [[topological space]] that is both a [[compact space|compact]] and [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]) is [[normal space|normal]].
Line 24: Line 18:
* [[Hausdorff implies KC|any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed]]: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
* [[Hausdorff implies KC|any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed]]: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
* [[Locally compact Hausdorff implies completely regular|Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular]]
* [[Locally compact Hausdorff implies completely regular|Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular]]
==Facts used==
# [[uses::Compactness is weakly hereditary]]: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
# A union of arbitrarily many open subsets is open.
# An intersection of finitely many open subsets is open.


==Proof==
==Proof==
Line 31: Line 31:
===Proof of regularity===
===Proof of regularity===


Suppose <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>. Our goal is to exhibit disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.
'''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>.  
 
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.


Let's do this. For every <math>y \in A</math>, use the fact that <math>X</math> is a [[Hausdorff space]] to construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math>.
'''Solution''':
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || For every <math>y \in A</math>, construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math>. In particular, the union of the <math>U_y</math>s contains <math>A</math> || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || -- || -- || --
|-
| 2 || <math>A</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||  ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>). Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the set <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> contains <math>A</math>. || -- || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^r U_{y_i}</math> is an open set || -- || Fact (2) || Step (3) ||
|-
| 5 || <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^r V_{y_i}</math> is an open set containing <math>x</math> || -- || Fact (3) || Steps (1),(3) || <toggledisplay>The crucial point is that there are ''finitely'' many open sets (<math>n</math> of them) being intersected, and each contains <math>x</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
| 6 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint || -- || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay>Each <math>U_{y_i}</math> is disjoint from the corresponding <math>V_{y_i}</math>. For <math>z \in U</math>, we must have <math>z \in U_{y_i}</math> for some <math>i</math>. But then, <math>z \notin V_{y_i}</math>, hence <math>z \notin V</math>. Thus, <math>U \cap V</math> is empty. </toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || The sets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively. || -- || -- || Steps (3)--(6) ||
|}


Now, using the fact that <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math>, and [[compactness is weakly hereditary|a closed subset of a compact space is compact]], we deduce that <math>A</math> is compact, so the <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>. Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the union of <math>U_{y_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math>.
===Proof of normality===


Then, <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^n V_{y_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.
'''Given''': Disjoint closed subsets <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> of <math>X</math>.


===Proof of normality===
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math>.


The process of jacking up from regularity to normality is completely analogous to the process of jacking up from Hausdorffness to regularity. Let's describe this process.
'''Solution''':


Suppose <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>X</math>. Then, for every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \supset x</math>. The open sets <math>V_x</math> yield an open cover of <math>B</math>, which is a closed, hence compact, subset of <math>X</math>, so there is a finite subcover <math>x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n</math>. The intersection of the <math>U_{x_i}</math>s and the union of the <math>V_{x_i}</math>s are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>.
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || For every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \ni x</math>. In particular, <math>V_x</math> form an open cover of <math>B</math>. || -- || -- || <math>X</math> is regular, by the previous half of the proof. ||
|-
| 2 || <math>B</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>B</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) || ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>V_x \cap B</math> have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>. Thus, the union <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> contains <math>B</math> || -- || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
| 4 || <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> || -- || Fact (2)  || Step (3) ||
|-
| 5 || <math>U = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> || -- ||  Fact (3) || Step (3) ||
|-
| 6 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint || -- || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay>Each <math>U_{x_i}</math> is disjoint from the corresponding <math>V_{x_i}</math>. For <math>z \in V</math>, we must have <math>z \in V_{x_i}</math> for some <math>i</math>. But then, <math>z \notin U_{x_i}</math>, hence <math>z \notin U</math>. Thus, <math>U \cap V</math> is empty. </toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint open subsets of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> respectively. || -- || -- || Steps (3)--(6) ||
|}


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 04:25, 30 January 2014

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., compact Hausdorff space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about compact Hausdorff space|Get more facts about normal space

Statement

Any compact Hausdorff space (a topological space that is both a compact and Hausdorff) is normal.

Related facts

Intermediate properties

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Compactness is weakly hereditary: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
  2. A union of arbitrarily many open subsets is open.
  3. An intersection of finitely many open subsets is open.

Proof

Suppose is a compact Hausdorff space. We need to show that is normal. We will proceed in two steps: we will first show that is a regular space, and then show that is normal.

Proof of regularity

Given: is a point and is a closed subset of not containing .

To find: Disjoint open subsets containing and respectively.

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For every , construct disjoint open subsets and . In particular, the union of the s contains is Hausdorff -- -- --
2 is compact is compact, is closed in Fact (1)
3 The have a finite subcover (as an open cover of ). Thus, there is a finite set of points such that the set contains . -- -- Step (2)
4 is an open set -- Fact (2) Step (3)
5 is an open set containing -- Fact (3) Steps (1),(3) [SHOW MORE]
6 and are disjoint -- -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
7 The sets and are disjoint open subsets containing and respectively. -- -- Steps (3)--(6)

Proof of normality

Given: Disjoint closed subsets and of .

To find: Disjoint open subsets and of such that and .

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For every point , we can define disjoint open subsets and . In particular, form an open cover of . -- -- is regular, by the previous half of the proof.
2 is compact is compact, is closed in Fact (1)
3 The have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points . Thus, the union contains -- -- Step (2)
4 is an open subset of -- Fact (2) Step (3)
5 is an open subset of -- Fact (3) Step (3)
6 and are disjoint -- -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
7 and are disjoint open subsets of containing and respectively. -- -- Steps (3)--(6)

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, Page 202, Theorem 32.3, More info
  • Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. Thorpe, Page 29, More info