Compact Hausdorff implies normal: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
stronger = compact Hausdorff space|
stronger = compact Hausdorff space|
weaker = normal space}}
weaker = normal space}}
 
[[Difficulty level::2| ]]
==Statement==
==Statement==
===Property-theoretic statement===
The [[property of topological spaces]] of being [[compact Hausdorff space|compact Hausdorff]] implies, or is stronger than, the property of being [[normal space|normal]].
===Verbal statement===


Any [[compact Hausdorff space]] (a [[topological space]] that is both a [[compact space|compact]] and [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]) is [[normal space|normal]].
Any [[compact Hausdorff space]] (a [[topological space]] that is both a [[compact space|compact]] and [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]) is [[normal space|normal]].
Line 28: Line 22:


# [[uses::Compactness is weakly hereditary]]: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
# [[uses::Compactness is weakly hereditary]]: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
# A union of arbitrarily many open subsets is open.
# An intersection of finitely many open subsets is open.


==Proof==
==Proof==
Line 42: Line 38:
   
   
{| class="sortable" border="1"
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || For every <math>y \in A</math>, construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math>. In particular, the union of the <math>U_y</math>s contains <math>A</math> || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || -- || -- || --
|-
| 2 || <math>A</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||  ||
|-
|-
| 1 || For every <math>y \in A</math>, construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math>. In particular, the union of the <math>U_y</math>s contains <math>A</math> || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || -- || --
| 3 || The <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>). Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the set <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> contains <math>A</math>. || -- || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
|-
| 2 || <math>A</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||  
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^r U_{y_i}</math> is an open set || -- || Fact (2) || Step (3) ||
|-
|-
| 3 || The <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>). Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the union of <math>U_{y_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math>. || -- || -- || Step (2)
| 5 || <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^r V_{y_i}</math> is an open set containing <math>x</math> || -- || Fact (3) || Steps (1),(3) || <toggledisplay>The crucial point is that there are ''finitely'' many open sets (<math>n</math> of them) being intersected, and each contains <math>x</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
|-
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^n V_{y_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively. ||-- || -- || Step (3)
| 6 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint || -- || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay>Each <math>U_{y_i}</math> is disjoint from the corresponding <math>V_{y_i}</math>. For <math>z \in U</math>, we must have <math>z \in U_{y_i}</math> for some <math>i</math>. But then, <math>z \notin V_{y_i}</math>, hence <math>z \notin V</math>. Thus, <math>U \cap V</math> is empty. </toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || The sets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively. || -- || -- || Steps (3)--(6) ||
|}
|}


Line 62: Line 64:


{| class="sortable" border="1"
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || For every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \ni x</math>. In particular, <math>V_x</math> form an open cover of <math>B</math>. || -- || -- || <math>X</math> is regular, by the previous half of the proof. ||
|-
| 2 || <math>B</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>B</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) || ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>V_x \cap B</math> have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>. Thus, the union <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> contains <math>B</math> || -- || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
|-
| 1 || For every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \ni x</math>. In particular, <math>V_x</math> form an open cover of <math>B</math>. || -- || -- || the "regularity" proof
| 4 || <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> || -- || Fact (2)  || Step (3) ||
|-
|-
| 2 || <math>B</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>B</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||
| 5 || <math>U = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> || -- ||  Fact (3) || Step (3) ||
|-
|-
| 3 || The <math>V_x \cap B</math> have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>. Thus, the union <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> is an open set containing <math>B</math> || -- || -- || Step (2)
| 6 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint || -- || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay>Each <math>U_{x_i}</math> is disjoint from the corresponding <math>V_{x_i}</math>. For <math>z \in V</math>, we must have <math>z \in V_{x_i}</math> for some <math>i</math>. But then, <math>z \notin U_{x_i}</math>, hence <math>z \notin U</math>. Thus, <math>U \cap V</math> is empty. </toggledisplay>
|-
|-
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets with <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math> || -- || -- || Step (1), (3)
| 7 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint open subsets of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> respectively. || -- || -- || Steps (3)--(6) ||
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 04:25, 30 January 2014

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., compact Hausdorff space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about compact Hausdorff space|Get more facts about normal space

Statement

Any compact Hausdorff space (a topological space that is both a compact and Hausdorff) is normal.

Related facts

Intermediate properties

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Compactness is weakly hereditary: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
  2. A union of arbitrarily many open subsets is open.
  3. An intersection of finitely many open subsets is open.

Proof

Suppose is a compact Hausdorff space. We need to show that is normal. We will proceed in two steps: we will first show that is a regular space, and then show that is normal.

Proof of regularity

Given: is a point and is a closed subset of not containing .

To find: Disjoint open subsets containing and respectively.

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For every , construct disjoint open subsets and . In particular, the union of the s contains is Hausdorff -- -- --
2 is compact is compact, is closed in Fact (1)
3 The have a finite subcover (as an open cover of ). Thus, there is a finite set of points such that the set contains . -- -- Step (2)
4 is an open set -- Fact (2) Step (3)
5 is an open set containing -- Fact (3) Steps (1),(3) [SHOW MORE]
6 and are disjoint -- -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
7 The sets and are disjoint open subsets containing and respectively. -- -- Steps (3)--(6)

Proof of normality

Given: Disjoint closed subsets and of .

To find: Disjoint open subsets and of such that and .

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For every point , we can define disjoint open subsets and . In particular, form an open cover of . -- -- is regular, by the previous half of the proof.
2 is compact is compact, is closed in Fact (1)
3 The have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points . Thus, the union contains -- -- Step (2)
4 is an open subset of -- Fact (2) Step (3)
5 is an open subset of -- Fact (3) Step (3)
6 and are disjoint -- -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
7 and are disjoint open subsets of containing and respectively. -- -- Steps (3)--(6)

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, Page 202, Theorem 32.3, More info
  • Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. Thorpe, Page 29, More info