Compact Hausdorff implies normal: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
(New page: {{topospace property implication}} ==Statement== ===Property-theoretic statement=== The property of topological spaces of being compact Hausdorff implies...)
 
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{topospace property implication}}
{{topospace property implication|
 
stronger = compact Hausdorff space|
weaker = normal space}}
[[Difficulty level::2| ]]
==Statement==
==Statement==
===Property-theoretic statement===
The [[property of topological spaces]] of being [[compact Hausdorff space|compact Hausdorff]] implies, or is stronger than, the property of being [[normal space|normal]].
===Verbal statement===


Any [[compact Hausdorff space]] (a [[topological space]] that is both a [[compact space|compact]] and [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]) is [[normal space|normal]].
Any [[compact Hausdorff space]] (a [[topological space]] that is both a [[compact space|compact]] and [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]) is [[normal space|normal]].
Line 22: Line 18:
* [[Hausdorff implies KC|any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed]]: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
* [[Hausdorff implies KC|any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed]]: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
* [[Locally compact Hausdorff implies completely regular|Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular]]
* [[Locally compact Hausdorff implies completely regular|Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular]]
==Facts used==
# [[uses::Compactness is weakly hereditary]]: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
# A union of arbitrarily many open subsets is open.
# An intersection of finitely many open subsets is open.


==Proof==
==Proof==
Line 29: Line 31:
===Proof of regularity===
===Proof of regularity===


'''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>.
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.
'''Solution''':
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || For every <math>y \in A</math>, construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math>. In particular, the union of the <math>U_y</math>s contains <math>A</math> || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || -- || -- || --
|-
| 2 || <math>A</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||  ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>). Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the set <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> contains <math>A</math>. || -- || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^r U_{y_i}</math> is an open set || -- || Fact (2) || Step (3) ||
|-
| 5 || <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^r V_{y_i}</math> is an open set containing <math>x</math> || -- || Fact (3) || Steps (1),(3) || <toggledisplay>The crucial point is that there are ''finitely'' many open sets (<math>n</math> of them) being intersected, and each contains <math>x</math>.</toggledisplay>
|-
| 6 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint || -- || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay>Each <math>U_{y_i}</math> is disjoint from the corresponding <math>V_{y_i}</math>. For <math>z \in U</math>, we must have <math>z \in U_{y_i}</math> for some <math>i</math>. But then, <math>z \notin V_{y_i}</math>, hence <math>z \notin V</math>. Thus, <math>U \cap V</math> is empty. </toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || The sets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively. || -- || -- || Steps (3)--(6) ||
|}
===Proof of normality===
'''Given''': Disjoint closed subsets <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> of <math>X</math>.
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math>.
'''Solution''':
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || For every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \ni x</math>. In particular, <math>V_x</math> form an open cover of <math>B</math>. || -- || -- || <math>X</math> is regular, by the previous half of the proof. ||
|-
| 2 || <math>B</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>B</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) || ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>V_x \cap B</math> have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>. Thus, the union <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> contains <math>B</math> || -- || -- || Step (2) ||
|-
| 4 || <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> || -- || Fact (2)  || Step (3) ||
|-
| 5 || <math>U = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> || -- ||  Fact (3) || Step (3) ||
|-
| 6 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint || -- || -- || Step (1) || <toggledisplay>Each <math>U_{x_i}</math> is disjoint from the corresponding <math>V_{x_i}</math>. For <math>z \in V</math>, we must have <math>z \in V_{x_i}</math> for some <math>i</math>. But then, <math>z \notin U_{x_i}</math>, hence <math>z \notin U</math>. Thus, <math>U \cap V</math> is empty. </toggledisplay>
|-
| 7 || <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> are disjoint open subsets of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> respectively. || -- || -- || Steps (3)--(6) ||
|}
==References==


Suppose <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>.
===Textbook references===
* {{booklink-proved|Munkres|202|Theorem 32.3}}
* {{booklink-stated|SingerThorpe|29}}

Latest revision as of 04:25, 30 January 2014

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., compact Hausdorff space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about compact Hausdorff space|Get more facts about normal space

Statement

Any compact Hausdorff space (a topological space that is both a compact and Hausdorff) is normal.

Related facts

Intermediate properties

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Compactness is weakly hereditary: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
  2. A union of arbitrarily many open subsets is open.
  3. An intersection of finitely many open subsets is open.

Proof

Suppose X is a compact Hausdorff space. We need to show that X is normal. We will proceed in two steps: we will first show that X is a regular space, and then show that X is normal.

Proof of regularity

Given: xX is a point and A is a closed subset of X not containing x.

To find: Disjoint open subsets containing A and x respectively.

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For every yA, construct disjoint open subsets Vyx and Uyy. In particular, the union of the Uys contains A X is Hausdorff -- -- --
2 A is compact X is compact, A is closed in X Fact (1)
3 The UyA have a finite subcover (as an open cover of A). Thus, there is a finite set y1,y2,,yr of points such that the set U=i=1nUyi contains A. -- -- Step (2)
4 U=i=1rUyi is an open set -- Fact (2) Step (3)
5 V=i=1rVyi is an open set containing x -- Fact (3) Steps (1),(3) [SHOW MORE]
6 U and V are disjoint -- -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
7 The sets U and V are disjoint open subsets containing A and x respectively. -- -- Steps (3)--(6)

Proof of normality

Given: Disjoint closed subsets A and B of X.

To find: Disjoint open subsets U and V of X such that AU and BV.

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used Explanation
1 For every point xB, we can define disjoint open subsets UxA and Vxx. In particular, Vx form an open cover of B. -- -- X is regular, by the previous half of the proof.
2 B is compact X is compact, B is closed in X Fact (1)
3 The VxB have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points x1,x2,,xn. Thus, the union V=i=1nVxi contains B -- -- Step (2)
4 V=i=1nVxi is an open subset of X -- Fact (2) Step (3)
5 U=i=1nUxi is an open subset of X -- Fact (3) Step (3)
6 U and V are disjoint -- -- Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
7 U and V are disjoint open subsets of X containing A and B respectively. -- -- Steps (3)--(6)

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, Page 202, Theorem 32.3, More info
  • Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. Thorpe, Page 29, More info