Compact Hausdorff implies normal: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
Line 24: Line 24:
* [[Hausdorff implies KC|any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed]]: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
* [[Hausdorff implies KC|any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed]]: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
* [[Locally compact Hausdorff implies completely regular|Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular]]
* [[Locally compact Hausdorff implies completely regular|Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular]]
==Facts used==
# [[uses::Compactness is weakly hereditary]]: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.


==Proof==
==Proof==
Line 31: Line 35:
===Proof of regularity===
===Proof of regularity===


Suppose <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>. Our goal is to exhibit disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.
'''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>.  
 
Let's do this. For every <math>y \in A</math>, use the fact that <math>X</math> is a [[Hausdorff space]] to construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math>.


Now, using the fact that <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math>, and [[compactness is weakly hereditary|a closed subset of a compact space is compact]], we deduce that <math>A</math> is compact, so the <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>. Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the union of <math>U_{y_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math>.
'''To do''': Exhibit disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.


Then, <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^n V_{y_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used
|-
| 1 || For every <math>y \in A</math>, construct disjoint open subsets <math>V_y \ni x</math> and <math>U_y \ni y</math> || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff. In particular, the union of the <math>U_y</math>s contains <math>A</math> || -- || --
|-
| 2 || <math>A</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>A</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>U_y \cap A</math> have a finite subcover (as an open cover of <math>A</math>. Thus, there is a finite set <math>y_1,y_2,\ldots, y_r</math> of points such that the union of <math>U_{y_i}</math> is an open subset of <math>X</math> containing <math>A</math>. || -- || -- || Step (2)
|-
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{y_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcap_{i=1}^n V_{y_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively. ||-- || -- || Step (3)
|}


===Proof of normality===
===Proof of normality===

Revision as of 14:14, 15 September 2010

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., compact Hausdorff space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about compact Hausdorff space|Get more facts about normal space

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of topological spaces of being compact Hausdorff implies, or is stronger than, the property of being normal.

Verbal statement

Any compact Hausdorff space (a topological space that is both a compact and Hausdorff) is normal.

Related facts

Intermediate properties

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Compactness is weakly hereditary: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.

Proof

Suppose X is a compact Hausdorff space. We need to show that X is normal. We will proceed in two steps: we will first show that X is a regular space, and then show that X is normal.

Proof of regularity

Given: xX is a point and A is a closed subset of X not containing x.

To do: Exhibit disjoint open subsets containing A and x respectively.

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used
1 For every yA, construct disjoint open subsets Vyx and Uyy X is Hausdorff. In particular, the union of the Uys contains A -- --
2 A is compact X is compact, A is closed in X Fact (1)
3 The UyA have a finite subcover (as an open cover of A. Thus, there is a finite set y1,y2,,yr of points such that the union of Uyi is an open subset of X containing A. -- -- Step (2)
4 U=i=1nUyi and V=i=1nVyi are disjoint open subsets containing A and x respectively. -- -- Step (3)

Proof of normality

The process of jacking up from regularity to normality is completely analogous to the process of jacking up from Hausdorffness to regularity. Let's describe this process.

Suppose A and B are disjoint closed subsets of X. Then, for every point xB, we can define disjoint open subsets UxA and Vxx. The open sets Vx yield an open cover of B, which is a closed, hence compact, subset of X, so there is a finite subcover x1,x2,,xn. The intersection of the Uxis and the union of the Vxis are disjoint open subsets containing A and B.

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, Page 202, Theorem 32.3, More info
  • Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. Thorpe, Page 29, More info