Compact Hausdorff implies normal: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
'''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>. | '''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>. | ||
'''To | '''To find''': Disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively. | ||
'''Solution''': | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | {| class="sortable" border="1" | ||
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used | ! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used | ||
| Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
===Proof of normality=== | ===Proof of normality=== | ||
'''Given''': Disjoint closed subsets <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> of <math>X</math>. | |||
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math>. | |||
'''Solution''': | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || For every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \ni x</math>. In particular, <math>V_x</math> form an open cover of <math>B</math>. || -- || -- || the "regularity" proof | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || <math>B</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>B</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) || | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || The <math>V_x \cap B</math> have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>. Thus, the union <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> is an open set containing <math>B</math> || -- || -- || Step (2) | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets with <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math> || -- || -- || Step (1), (3) | |||
|} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 15 September 2010
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., compact Hausdorff space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about compact Hausdorff space|Get more facts about normal space
Statement
Property-theoretic statement
The property of topological spaces of being compact Hausdorff implies, or is stronger than, the property of being normal.
Verbal statement
Any compact Hausdorff space (a topological space that is both a compact and Hausdorff) is normal.
Related facts
Intermediate properties
- Paracompact Hausdorff space: Further information: paracompact Hausdorff implies normal
- any closed subset of a compact space is compact
- any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed: The proof of this uses a very similar argument.
- Any locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular
Facts used
- Compactness is weakly hereditary: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.
Proof
Suppose is a compact Hausdorff space. We need to show that is normal. We will proceed in two steps: we will first show that is a regular space, and then show that is normal.
Proof of regularity
Given: is a point and is a closed subset of not containing .
To find: Disjoint open subsets containing and respectively.
Solution:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Given data used | Facts used | Previous steps used |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | For every , construct disjoint open subsets and . In particular, the union of the s contains | is Hausdorff | -- | -- |
| 2 | is compact | is compact, is closed in | Fact (1) | |
| 3 | The have a finite subcover (as an open cover of ). Thus, there is a finite set of points such that the union of is an open subset of containing . | -- | -- | Step (2) |
| 4 | and are disjoint open subsets containing and respectively. | -- | -- | Step (3) |
Proof of normality
Given: Disjoint closed subsets and of .
To find: Disjoint open subsets and of such that and .
Solution:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Given data used | Facts used | Previous steps used |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | For every point , we can define disjoint open subsets and . In particular, form an open cover of . | -- | -- | the "regularity" proof |
| 2 | is compact | is compact, is closed in | Fact (1) | |
| 3 | The have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points . Thus, the union is an open set containing | -- | -- | Step (2) |
| 4 | and are disjoint open subsets with and | -- | -- | Step (1), (3) |