Compact Hausdorff implies normal: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
Line 37: Line 37:
'''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>.  
'''Given''': <math>x \in X</math> is a point and <math>A</math> is a [[closed subset]] of <math>X</math> not containing <math>x</math>.  


'''To do''': Exhibit disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>x</math> respectively.


'''Solution''':
{| class="sortable" border="1"
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used
Line 53: Line 55:
===Proof of normality===
===Proof of normality===


The process of jacking up from regularity to normality is completely analogous to the process of jacking up from Hausdorffness to regularity. Let's describe this process.
'''Given''': Disjoint closed subsets <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> of <math>X</math>.


Suppose <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are disjoint closed subsets of <math>X</math>. Then, for every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \supset x</math>. The open sets <math>V_x</math> yield an open cover of <math>B</math>, which is a closed, hence compact, subset of <math>X</math>, so there is a finite subcover <math>x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n</math>. The intersection of the <math>U_{x_i}</math>s and the union of the <math>V_{x_i}</math>s are disjoint open subsets containing <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>.
'''To find''': Disjoint open subsets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math>.
 
'''Solution''':
 
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Given data used !! Facts used !! Previous steps used
|-
| 1 || For every point <math>x \in B</math>, we can define disjoint open subsets <math>U_x \supset A</math> and <math>V_x \ni x</math>. In particular, <math>V_x</math> form an open cover of <math>B</math>. || -- || -- || the "regularity" proof
|-
| 2 || <math>B</math> is compact || <math>X</math> is compact, <math>B</math> is closed in <math>X</math> || Fact (1) ||
|-
| 3 || The <math>V_x \cap B</math> have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>. Thus, the union <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> is an open set containing <math>B</math> || -- || -- || Step (2)
|-
| 4 || <math>U = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}</math> and <math>V = \bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i}</math> are disjoint open subsets with <math>A \subseteq U</math> and <math>B \subseteq V</math> || -- || -- || Step (1), (3)
|}


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 14:32, 15 September 2010

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two topological space properties. That is, it states that every topological space satisfying the first topological space property (i.e., compact Hausdorff space) must also satisfy the second topological space property (i.e., normal space)
View all topological space property implications | View all topological space property non-implications
Get more facts about compact Hausdorff space|Get more facts about normal space

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of topological spaces of being compact Hausdorff implies, or is stronger than, the property of being normal.

Verbal statement

Any compact Hausdorff space (a topological space that is both a compact and Hausdorff) is normal.

Related facts

Intermediate properties

Other related facts

Facts used

  1. Compactness is weakly hereditary: Any closed subset of a compact space is compact.

Proof

Suppose is a compact Hausdorff space. We need to show that is normal. We will proceed in two steps: we will first show that is a regular space, and then show that is normal.

Proof of regularity

Given: is a point and is a closed subset of not containing .

To find: Disjoint open subsets containing and respectively.

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used
1 For every , construct disjoint open subsets and . In particular, the union of the s contains is Hausdorff -- --
2 is compact is compact, is closed in Fact (1)
3 The have a finite subcover (as an open cover of ). Thus, there is a finite set of points such that the union of is an open subset of containing . -- -- Step (2)
4 and are disjoint open subsets containing and respectively. -- -- Step (3)

Proof of normality

Given: Disjoint closed subsets and of .

To find: Disjoint open subsets and of such that and .

Solution:

Step no. Assertion/construction Given data used Facts used Previous steps used
1 For every point , we can define disjoint open subsets and . In particular, form an open cover of . -- -- the "regularity" proof
2 is compact is compact, is closed in Fact (1)
3 The have a finite subcover, say corresponding to points . Thus, the union is an open set containing -- -- Step (2)
4 and are disjoint open subsets with and -- -- Step (1), (3)

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, Page 202, Theorem 32.3, More info
  • Lecture Notes on Elementary Topology and Geometry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) by I. M. Singer and J. A. Thorpe, Page 29, More info