Hausdorffness is hereditary: Difference between revisions

From Topospaces
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
==Proof==
==Proof==


===Proof outline===
'''Given''': A topological space <math>X</math>, a subset <math>A</math> of <math>X</math>. Two distinct points <math>x_1,x_2 \in A</math>.


The proof has the following key steps:
'''To prove''': There exist disjoint open subsets <math>U_1,U_2</math> of <math>A</math> such that <math>x_1 \in U_1,x_2 \in U_2</math>.


* Start with two points in the subspace
'''Proof''':
* View them as points in the whole space
 
* Separate them by disjoint open sets in the whole space
{| class="sortable" border="1"
* Intersect these open sets with the subspace, and use the definition of subspace topology to note that we get disjoint open sets in the subspace separating the points
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used!! Previous steps used !! Explanation
|-
| 1 || <math>x_1, x_2</math> are distinct points of <math>X</math> || || <math>x_1,x_2</math> are distinct points of <math>A</math><br><math>A \subseteq X</math> ||
|-
| 2 || There exist disjoint open subsets <math>V_1, V_2</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>x_1 \in V_1, x_2 \in V_2</math>. || || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || Step (1) || Step-given  direct
|-
| 3 || Define <math>U_1 = V_1 \cap A</math> and <math>U_2 = V_2 \cap A</math>. || || || ||
|-
| 4 || <math>U_1, U_2</math> are open subsets of <math>A</math>. || definition of subspace topology || || Steps (2), (3) || By Step (2), <math>V_1,V_2</math> are open, so by the definition of subspace topology, <math>U_1, U_2</math> are open as per their definitions in Step (3).
|-
| 5 || <math>U_1, U_2</math> are disjoint. || || || Steps (2), (3) || follows directly from <math>V_1,V_2</math> being disjoint
|-
| 6 || <math>x_1 \in U_1, x_2 \in U_2</math> || || <math>x_1,x_2 \in A</math> || Steps (2), (3) || By Step (3), <math>U_1 = V_1 \cap A</math>. By Step (2), <math>x_1 \in V_1</math>, and we are also given that <math>x_1 \in A</math>, so <math>x_1 \in V_1 \cap A = U_1</math>. Similarly, <math>x_2 \in U_2</math>.
|-
| 7 || <math>U_1,U_2</math> are the desired open subsets of <math>A</math>. || || || Steps (4)-(6) || Step-combination direct, it's what we want to prove.
|}


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 23:54, 24 January 2012

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., Hausdorff space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about Hausdorff space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of Hausdorff space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of Hausdorff space|Get more facts about subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of topological spaces of being Hausdorff, is hereditary.

Verbal statement

Any subspace of a Hausdorff space is Hausdorff, in the subspace topology.

Definitions used

Hausdorff space

Further information: Hausdorff space

A topological space X is Hausdorff if given distinct points a,bX there exist disjoint open subsets U,V containing a,b respectively.

Subspace topology

Further information: subspace topology

If A is a subset of X, we declare a subset V of A to be open in A if V=UA for an open subset U of X.

Proof

Given: A topological space X, a subset A of X. Two distinct points x1,x2A.

To prove: There exist disjoint open subsets U1,U2 of A such that x1U1,x2U2.

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 x1,x2 are distinct points of X x1,x2 are distinct points of A
AX
2 There exist disjoint open subsets V1,V2 of X such that x1V1,x2V2. X is Hausdorff Step (1) Step-given direct
3 Define U1=V1A and U2=V2A.
4 U1,U2 are open subsets of A. definition of subspace topology Steps (2), (3) By Step (2), V1,V2 are open, so by the definition of subspace topology, U1,U2 are open as per their definitions in Step (3).
5 U1,U2 are disjoint. Steps (2), (3) follows directly from V1,V2 being disjoint
6 x1U1,x2U2 x1,x2A Steps (2), (3) By Step (3), U1=V1A. By Step (2), x1V1, and we are also given that x1A, so x1V1A=U1. Similarly, x2U2.
7 U1,U2 are the desired open subsets of A. Steps (4)-(6) Step-combination direct, it's what we want to prove.

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, More info, Page 100, Theorem 17.11, Page 101, Exercise 12 and Page 196 (Theorem 31.2 (a))