Hausdorffness is hereditary

From Topospaces

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., Hausdorff space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about Hausdorff space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of Hausdorff space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of Hausdorff space|Get more facts about subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces

Statement

Any subspace of a Hausdorff space is Hausdorff in the subspace topology.

Definitions used

Hausdorff space

Further information: Hausdorff space

A topological space is Hausdorff if given distinct points there exist disjoint open subsets containing respectively.

Subspace topology

Further information: subspace topology

If is a subset of , we declare a subset of to be open in if for an open subset of .

Proof

Given: A topological space , a subset of . Two distinct points .

To prove: There exist disjoint open subsets of such that .

Proof:

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 are distinct points of are distinct points of
2 There exist disjoint open subsets of such that . is Hausdorff Step (1) Step-given direct
3 Define and .
4 are open subsets of . definition of subspace topology Steps (2), (3) By Step (2), are open, so by the definition of subspace topology, are open as per their definitions in Step (3).
5 are disjoint. Steps (2), (3) follows directly from being disjoint
6 Steps (2), (3) By Step (3), . By Step (2), , and we are also given that , so . Similarly, .
7 are the desired open subsets of . Steps (4)-(6) Step-combination direct, it's what we want to prove.

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, More info, Page 100, Theorem 17.11, Page 101, Exercise 12 and Page 196 (Theorem 31.2 (a))