Hausdorffness is hereditary: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
(→Proof) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used!! Previous steps used !! Explanation | ! Step no. !! Assertion/construction !! Facts used !! Given data used!! Previous steps used !! Explanation | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1 || <math>x_1, x_2</math> are distinct points of <math>X</math> || || <math>x_1,x_2</math> are distinct points of <math>A</math><br><math>A \subseteq X</math> || | | 1 || <math>x_1, x_2</math> are distinct points of <math>X</math> || || <math>x_1,x_2</math> are distinct points of <math>A</math><br><math>A \subseteq X</math> || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 || There exist disjoint open subsets <math>V_1, V_2</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>x_1 \in V_1, x_2 \in V_2</math>. || || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || Step (1) || Step-given direct | | 2 || There exist disjoint open subsets <math>V_1, V_2</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>x_1 \in V_1, x_2 \in V_2</math>. || || <math>X</math> is Hausdorff || Step (1) || Step-given direct | ||
Revision as of 23:55, 24 January 2012
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., Hausdorff space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about Hausdorff space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of Hausdorff space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of Hausdorff space|Get more facts about subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces
Statement
Property-theoretic statement
The property of topological spaces of being Hausdorff, is hereditary.
Verbal statement
Any subspace of a Hausdorff space is Hausdorff, in the subspace topology.
Definitions used
Hausdorff space
Further information: Hausdorff space
A topological space is Hausdorff if given distinct points there exist disjoint open subsets containing respectively.
Subspace topology
Further information: subspace topology
If is a subset of , we declare a subset of to be open in if for an open subset of .
Proof
Given: A topological space , a subset of . Two distinct points .
To prove: There exist disjoint open subsets of such that .
Proof:
| Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | are distinct points of | are distinct points of |
|||
| 2 | There exist disjoint open subsets of such that . | is Hausdorff | Step (1) | Step-given direct | |
| 3 | Define and . | ||||
| 4 | are open subsets of . | definition of subspace topology | Steps (2), (3) | By Step (2), are open, so by the definition of subspace topology, are open as per their definitions in Step (3). | |
| 5 | are disjoint. | Steps (2), (3) | follows directly from being disjoint | ||
| 6 | Steps (2), (3) | By Step (3), . By Step (2), , and we are also given that , so . Similarly, . | |||
| 7 | are the desired open subsets of . | Steps (4)-(6) | Step-combination direct, it's what we want to prove. |
References
Textbook references
- Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, More info, Page 100, Theorem 17.11, Page 101, Exercise 12 and Page 196 (Theorem 31.2 (a))