Convention:Hausdorffness assumption: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==For separation axioms== | ==For separation axioms== | ||
We do ''not'' assume [[normal space]]s or [[regular space]]s to satisfy the T1 or Hausdorff conditions. ''Note'': Earlier we did make that assumption, so some content is outdated and not synced with the latest assumptions. | |||
==For compactness axioms== | ==For compactness axioms== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 27 January 2012
This article is about a convention that is followed in this wiki. The aim is that every page on the wiki follows this convention unless explicitly stated otherwise on the page; however, in practice, this may not have been implemented
For separation axioms
We do not assume normal spaces or regular spaces to satisfy the T1 or Hausdorff conditions. Note: Earlier we did make that assumption, so some content is outdated and not synced with the latest assumptions.
For compactness axioms
For compactness-type properties, we do not assume Hausdorffness. Thus, a compact space need not be Hausdorff. This convention is again in line with a number of general-purpose textbooks in point-set topology, but is not in line with terminology in algebraic geometry, which often follows the Bourbaki convention of calling a compact non-Hausdorff space quasi-compact.
For manifolds
We assume manifolds to be Hausdorff. This convention is again in line with most treatises on point-set topology, algebraic topology, and differential topology. The non-Hausdorff versions are called locally Euclidean spaces here.