Statement
In this article, we give the key results relating the homology groups of a topological space and the homology groups of its Suspension (?).
Version for unreduced homology
This states that:
where
and
denote the
and
homology groups. The result also holds for homology groups with coefficients.
Further:
and:
Version for reduced homology
This states that:
where
denotes the reduced homology. Note that for
, reduced homology and unreduced homology coincide; for
, the unreduced homology has an extra
in it. For
, the right side is the trivial group, giving that
is trivial, so
is a path-connected space.
Category-theoretic version
The isomorphisms between the homology groups of a topological space and its suspension are natural isomorphisms between these functors. In particular, if
is a continuous map, then we have an induced continuous map
. There is a commuting diagram relating the homomorphism on
reduced homology between
and
and the homomorphism on
reduced homology between
and
.
Facts used
- Mayer-Vietoris homology sequence
Proof
Recall that
is obtained by taking
(where
is the closed unit interval) and then identifying all points in
with each other and separately identifying all points in
with each other. We will call these two points
and
respectively. We consider the following open subsets
and
to use for the Mayer-Vietoris homology sequence:
| Subset |
Concrete description |
Has a strong deformation retraction to ... |
More explanation
|
 |
 |
a point (i.e., it is contractible) |
is homeomorphic to the cone space
|
 |
 |
a point (i.e., it is contractible) |
is homeomorphic to the cone space
|
 |
 |
 |
the factor is a contractible space
|
Proof version with reduced homology
We note that
and
are open subsets and their union is
. Further, because of the strong deformation retraction facts mentioned, all reduced homology groups of
and
are trivial groups and all reduced homology groups of
are isomorphic to the corresponding reduced homology groups of
.
The original Mayer-Vietoris homology sequence reads:
Every third term of this sequence is zero, aand the fragment above simplifies to:
Since this is a long exact sequence, the map
is forced to be an isomorphism. This completes the proof.