Regularity is hereditary

From Topospaces

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a topological space property (i.e., regular space) satisfying a topological space metaproperty (i.e., subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces)
View all topological space metaproperty satisfactions | View all topological space metaproperty dissatisfactions
Get more facts about regular space |Get facts that use property satisfaction of regular space | Get facts that use property satisfaction of regular space|Get more facts about subspace-hereditary property of topological spaces

Statement

Any subset of a regular space is regular under the subspace topology.

Definitions used

Fill this in later

Related facts

Similar facts

Property Proof that is is subspace-hereditary
Hausdorff space Hausdorffness is hereditary
completely regular space complete regularity is hereditary
Urysohn space Urysohn is hereditary
T1 space T1 is hereditary

Other similar facts:

Opposite facts

Facts used

  1. T1 is hereditary

Proof

Given: A topological space , a subset of . is regular.

To prove: is regular.

Proof: The T1 property for follows from Fact (1). It thus suffices to show the separation property for , i.e., that any point and disjoint closed subset in can be separated by a continuous function. In other words, we want to prove the following.

To prove (specific): For any point and any closed subset of such that , there exist disjoint open subsets of such that and .

Proof (specific):

Step no. Assertion/construction Facts used Given data used Previous steps used Explanation
1 There exists a closed subset of such that . definition of subspace topology is closed in .
2 is not in Step (1) [SHOW MORE]
3 There exist disjoint open subsets of such that . is regular Steps (1), (2) Step-given combination direct
4 Define and .
5 are open subsets of . definition of subspace topology Steps (3), (4) By Step (2), are open, so by the definition of subspace topology, are open as per their definitions in Step (3).
6 are disjoint. Steps (3), (4) follows directly from being disjoint
7 Steps (3), (4) By Step (4), . By Step (3), , and we are also given that , so . Similarly, and , so .
8 are the desired open subsets. Steps (5)-(7) Step-combination, this is exactly what we want to prove.

This proof uses a tabular format for presentation. Learn more about tabular proof formats|View all pages on facts with proofs in tabular format

References

Textbook references

  • Topology (2nd edition) by James R. Munkres, More info, Page 196, Theorem 31.2(b), Chapter 4, Section 31